Fixed packages 14
| Release | Package | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-arbitrator | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-core | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-core-debuginfo | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-debugsource | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-site | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::highavailability | booth-test | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-arbitrator | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-core | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-core-debuginfo | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-debugsource | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-site | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat · RHEL 9 enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage | booth-test | 0:1.1-1.el9_4.1 |
Vulnerabilities 1
-
Medium 5.9
Booth: specially crafted hash can lead to invalid hmac being accepted by booth server
A flaw was found in Booth, a cluster ticket manager. If a specially-crafted hash is passed to gcry_md_get_algo_dlen(), it may allow an invalid HMAC to be accepted by the Booth server.
References
-
article
https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important
-
report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272082
-
advisory
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2024/rhsa-2024_3661.json
-
report
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-3049
-
advisory
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3049
-
advisory
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3049
-
article
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/142