Archive
5 February 2025
Vulnerabilities first published on this day (UTC), newest first.
44 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Medium 4.3
IBM ApplinX Information Disclosure
IBM ApplinX 11.1 stores sensitive information in cleartext in memory that could be obtained by an authenticated user.
-
Medium 4.3
IBM ApplinX Information Disclosure
IBM ApplinX 11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.
-
Medium 5.9
IBM ApplinX Information Disclosure
IBM ApplinX 11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techn…
-
Medium 5.4
IBM ApplinX Clickjacking
IBM ApplinX 11.1 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch furth…
-
Medium 4.3
IBM ApplinX Cross-Site Request Forgery
IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
-
Medium 4.3
IBM ApplinX Cross-Site Request Forgery
IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
-
Medium 5.4
IBM ApplinX Cross-Site Scripting
IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted se…
-
Medium 5.4
IBM ApplinX Cross-Site Scripting
IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted se…
-
Medium 6.4
IBM ApplinX Cross-Site Scripting
IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted se…
-
Medium 5.3
IBM Aspera Shares Data Manipulation
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 could allow an attacker to spoof their IP address, which is written to log files, due to improper verification of 'Client-IP' headers.
-
Medium 6.4
IBM Aspera Shares Cross-Site Scripting
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials…
-
Medium 5.4
IBM Aspera Shares Server-Side Request Forgery
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
-
Medium 5.4
IBM Aspera Shares Server-Side Request Forgery
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
-
Medium 4.8
IBM Aspera Shares HTML injection
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.
-
Medium 4.8
IBM Aspera Shares Cross-Site Scripting
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosu…
-
Medium 4.3
IBM Aspera Shares Denial of Service
IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 does not properly rate limit the frequency that an authenticated user can send emails, which could result in email flooding or a denial of service.
-
Medium 4.8
Partial Denial of Service (DoS) in MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework. According to Apple's documentation for bundle ID's, it must contain only alphanumeric chara…
-
Medium 5.3
Generic UDP Encapsulation (GUE) (IETF Draft) do not validate or verify the source of a network packet
Proposed Generic UDP Encapsulation (GUE) (IETF Draft) do not validate or verify the source of a network packet allowing an attacker to spoof and route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface that can lead to spoofing, access control bypass, and oth…
-
Medium 5.3CVE-2024-7595 Public exploit
GRE and GRE6 Protocols (RFC2784) do not validate or verify the source of a network packet
GRE and GRE6 Protocols (RFC2784) do not validate or verify the source of a network packet allowing an attacker to spoof and route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface that can lead to spoofing, access control bypass, and other unexpected network…
-
Medium 4.3CVE-2025-23419 Public exploit
TLS Session Resumption Vulnerability
When multiple server blocks are configured to share the same IP address and port, an attacker can use session resumption to bypass client certificate authentication requirements on these servers. This vulnerability arises when TLS Session Tickets https://ngin…
-
Medium 6.5
BIG-IP Next Central Manager vulnerability
When BIG-IP Next Central Manager is running, undisclosed requests to the BIG-IP Next Central Manager API can cause the BIG-IP Next Central Manager Node's Kubernetes service to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoT…
-
Medium 4.4
BIG-IP Next Central Manager vulnerability
When users log in through the webUI or API using local authentication, BIG-IP Next Central Manager may log sensitive information in the pgaudit log files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
-
Medium 4.3
Cisco Secure Email Gateway, Cisco Secure Email and Web Appliance and Cisco Secure Web Appliance SNMP Polling Information Disclosure Vulnerability
A vulnerability in Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) polling for Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager, Cisco Secure Email Gateway, and Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain confidential information about the …
-
Medium 4.8
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) guest portals co…
-
Medium 4.8
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) guest portals co…
-
Medium 6.5
Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Web Appliance Command Injection Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an affected device. The at…
-
Medium 5.8
Cisco Secure Web Appliance Range Request Bypass Vulnerability
A vulnerability in a policy-based Cisco Application Visibility and Control (AVC) implementation of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to evade the antivirus scanner and download a malicious fi…
-
Medium 4.8
Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Email Gateway Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Email Gateway could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user …
-
Medium 6.1
Cisco Expressway Series Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Expressway Series could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based ma…
-
Medium 5.5
HCL iAutomate is affected by a session fixation vulnerability
HCL iAutomate is affected by a session fixation vulnerability. An attacker could hijack a victim's session ID from their authenticated session.
-
Medium 5.8
Certain Poly Devices – Path Traversal Vulnerability - Arbitrary File Access by Unauthorized User
A vulnerability was discovered in the firmware builds up to 8.2.1.0820 in certain Poly devices. The firmware flaw does not properly prevent path traversal and could lead to information disclosure.
-
Medium 6.6
Dell Avamar, version 19.4 or later, contains an access token reuse vulnerability in the AUI. A low privileged local att…
-
Medium 6.5
Missing Authorization in GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.0 prior to 16.9.7, starting from 16.10 prior to 16.10.5, and starting from 16.11 prior to 16.11.2. It was possible to disclose via the UI the confidential issues title and de…
-
Medium 4.3
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation incorrect privilege assignment
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1, and 22.0.2 allows restricting access to organizational data to valid contexts. The fact that tasks of type comment ca…
-
Medium 6.4
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation cross-site scripting
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1, and 22.0.2 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbit…
-
Medium 5.4
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation cross-site scripting
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1, and 22.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary …
-
Medium 4.4
Incorrect User Management in GitLab
An issue was discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 16.0 prior to 17.0.6, starting from 17.1 prior to 17.1.4, and starting from 17.2 prior to 17.2.2, which allowed cross project access for Security policy bot.
-
Medium 4.3
Missing Authorization in GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 15.2 prior to 16.9.7, starting from 16.10 prior to 16.10.5, and starting from 16.11 prior to 16.11.2. It was possible to disclose updates to issues to a banned group member using t…
-
Medium 6.5
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
A denial of service vulnerability was identified in GitLab CE/EE, affecting all versions from 15.11 prior to 16.6.7, 16.7 prior to 16.7.5 and 16.8 prior to 16.8.2 which allows an attacker to spike the GitLab instance resource usage resulting in service degrad…
-
Medium 6.2
netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired nftables selftests fail: run-tests.sh testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0 Expected: 0-2 . 0-3, got: W: [FAILED] ./testcases…