Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

Base Incomplete

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
  1. Requirements

    Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

    For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

    Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  2. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

    Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  3. Operation, Build and Compilation

    Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

    D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  4. Implementation

    Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:

    - Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify.

    - When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.

    - Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.

    - If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.

  5. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

  6. Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

  7. Operation, Build and Compilation

    Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

    Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

    For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  8. Operation

    Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

    For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

Source: MITRE CWE-120

525 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • Critical 9.8

    Matthias-Wandel/jhead jhead 3.06 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via shellescape(), jhead.c, jhead. jhead copies strin…

  • Critical 9.8

    Certain versions of HP PC Hardware Diagnostics Windows are potentially vulnerable to buffer overflow.

  • Critical 9.8

    Multiple models of the Uniview IP Camera (e.g., IPC_G6103 B6103.16.10.B25.201218, IPC_G61, IPC21, IPC23, IPC32, IPC36, …

  • Critical 10.0

    Denial-of-Service and Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in MELSEC Series CPU module

    Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series CPU modules and MELSEC iQ-R Series CPU modules allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (Do…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-33009 Exploited EPSS 28%

    A buffer overflow vulnerability in the notification function in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions 4.60 through 5.36 Pa…

    KEV Jun 5, 2023
  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-33010 Exploited EPSS 29%

    A buffer overflow vulnerability in the ID processing function in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions 4.32 through 5.36 P…

    KEV Jun 5, 2023
  • Critical 9.8

    The GarminOS TVM component in CIQ API version 1.0.0 through 4.1.7 is vulnerable to various buffer overflows when loadin…

  • Critical 9.0
    CVE-2023-31475 EPSS 14%

    An issue was discovered on GL.iNet devices before 3.216. The function guci2_get() found in libglutil.so has a buffer ov…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in Services Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

    There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in multiple underlying services that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful…

  • Critical 9.8

    Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Buffer Overflow and/or Remote Code Execution.

  • Critical 9.8

    Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Buffer Overflow and/or Elevation of Privilege.

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-28769 Public exploit

    The buffer overflow vulnerability in the library “libclinkc.so” of the web server “zhttpd” in Zyxel DX5401-B0 firmware …

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability found in Netgear R6900 v.1.0.2.26, R6700v3 v.1.0.4.128, R6700 v.1.0.0.26 allows a remote …

  • Critical 10.0

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Qihoo 360 Safe Browser v13.0.2170.0 allows attacker to escalate priveleges.

  • Critical 10.0

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Qihoo 360 Total Security v10.8.0.1060 and v10.8.0.1213 allows attacker to escalate pri…

  • Critical 9.3

    Buffer copy without checking the size of input in Core

    Memory corruption due to buffer copy without checking the size of input in Core while sending SCM command to get write protection information.

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer copy without checking the size of input in Modem

    Memory corruption due to buffer copy without checking the size of input in modem while decoding raw SMS received.

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in MODEM

    Memory corruption in modem due to buffer overwrite while building an IPv6 multicast address based on the MAC address of the iface

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in MODEM

    Memory correction in modem due to buffer overwrite during coap connection

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Overflow found in Nginx NJS allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the njs_object_property param…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-25076 EPSS 66%

    A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of wildcard backend hosts of SNIProxy 0.6.0-2 and the master bra…

  • Critical 9.8

    Stack buffer overflow in UniRPC library function

    Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 suffer from a stack-based buffer overflow that can lead to remote code execution as the root user.

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-28502 Public exploit EPSS 60%

    Stack buffer overflow in UniRPC's udadmin_server service

    Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 suffer from a stack-based buffer overflow in the "udadmin" service that can lead to remote code execution as the root user.

  • Critical 9.8

    The Kamailio SIP before 5.5.0 server mishandles INVITE requests with duplicated fields and overlength tag, leading to a…

  • Critical 9.8

    Tenda V15V1.0 V15.11.0.14(1521_3190_1058) was discovered to contain a buffer overflow vulnerability via the wifiFilterL…

  • Critical 9.8

    Tenda V15V1.0 V15.11.0.14(1521_3190_1058) was discovered to contain a buffer overflow vulnerability via the DNSDomainNa…

  • Critical 9.8

    A Buffer Overflow vulnerabilityexists in Pev 0.81 via the pe_exports function from exports.c.. The array offsets_to_Nam…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-27853 EPSS 20%

    NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi6 Router prior to V1.0.10.94 contains a format string vulnerability in a SOAP service that could …

  • Critical 9.8

    NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi6 Router prior to V1.0.10.94 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in various CGI mechanisms t…

  • Critical 9.8

    A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.7.3, macOS…

  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Saltstack v.3003 and before allows attacker to execute arbitrary code via the func var…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2023-20032 EPSS 30%

    On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the HFS+ …

  • Critical 10.0

    A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.2 (All versions), COMOS V10.3.3.1 (All versions < V10.3.3.1.45), COMOS…