Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
2,042 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
High 7.1
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Plugins Page of WonderCMS v3.4.3 allows attackers to force the application …
-
High 7.5CVE-2024-40815 Public exploit
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.6 and iPadOS 17.6, macOS Sonom…
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Spina CMS v.2.18.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileg…
-
High 8.8CVE-2024-40119 Public exploit
Nepstech Wifi Router xpon (terminal) model NTPL-Xpon1GFEVN v.1.0 Firmware V2.0.1 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery …
-
High 7.4
WordPress Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium) plugin <= 2.21.13 - CSRF Leading to Arbitrary File Deletion vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium).This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium): from n/a through 2.21.13.
-
High 7.1
WordPress Comment Reply Email plugin <= 1.3 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPJohnny, zerOneIT Comment Reply Email allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Comment Reply Email: from n/a through 1.3.
-
High 7.1
WordPress AliExpress Dropshipping with AliNext Lite plugin <= 3.4.6 - CSRF to XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in guru-aliexpress AliNext ali2woo-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AliNext: from n/a through <= 3.4.6.
-
High 8.8
1-Click compromize via CSRF
Cross-Site request forgery in Checkmk < 2.3.0p8, < 2.2.0p29, < 2.1.0p45, and <= 2.0.0p39 (EOL) could lead to 1-click compromize of the site.
-
High 8.7
Insecure handling of GET argument in Phoniebox
Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malicious requests to multiple hosts on the l…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/serverFile_deal.php…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/softBak_deal.php?mu…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/dbBakMySQL_deal.php…
-
High 7.2
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) weaknesses [CWE-352] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an…
-
High 8.8
ScrollTo Top <= 1.2.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The ScrollTo Top plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'options_page' function. This m…
-
High 8.8
ScrollTo Bottom <= 1.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The ScrollTo Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'options_page' function. Thi…
-
High 8.8
Advanced AJAX Page Loader <= 2.7.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Advanced AJAX Page Loader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.7.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'admin_init_AAPL' function and missing file type va…
-
High 8.8
Attachment File Icons (AF Icons) <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Attachment File Icons (AF Icons) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'afi_overview' function and missing file type …
-
High 8.8
Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 <= 4.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'wp_cf7_pd…
-
High 8.8
Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 <= 4.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Deletion
The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and the plugin not properly validating a file or i…
-
High 8.8
Lime Survey <= 6.5.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The YII_CSRF_TOKEN is only checked when passe…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userLevel_deal.php?…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userScore_deal.php?…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userGroup_deal.php?…
-
High 8.8
A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the boa CSRF protection functionality of Realtek rtl819x Ju…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via admin/info_deal.php?mudi=a…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/infoSys_deal.php?mu…
-
High 8.8
Nested Pages <= 3.2.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Local File Inclusion
The Nested Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'settingsPage' function and missing santization of the 'tab' parameter. …
-
High 8.1
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Sola Testimonials versions prior to 3.0.0. If this vulnerability i…
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence allows attackers to m…
-
High 8.1
CSRF Vulnerability in stitionai/devika
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in the stitionai/devika application, affecting the latest version. This vulnerability allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions in the context of a victim's browser, such as deleting proj…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/userSys_deal.php?mu…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/keyWord_deal.php?mu…
-
High 7.6
CSRF Vulnerability in parisneo/lollms XTTS Server
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the XTTS server of parisneo/lollms version 9.6 due to a lax CORS policy. The vulnerability allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by tricking a user into visiting a malicious webpage, which…
-
High 7.2
UberMenu <= 3.8.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Reset
The UberMenu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ubermenu_delete_all_item_settings and ubermenu_reset_settings functions. Thi…
-
High 8.3
WordPress AliExpress Dropshipping with AliNext Lite plugin <= 3.3.5 - CSRF to PHP Object Injection vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ali2Woo Ali2Woo Lite.This issue affects Ali2Woo Lite: from n/a through 3.3.5.
-
High 8.8
Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery <= 3.2.19 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Post Creation and Limited Data Loss
The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rbs_ajax_create_article' and 'rb…
-
High 8.8
moodle: CSRF risks due to misuse of confirm_sesskey
Incorrect CSRF token checks resulted in multiple CSRF risks.
-
High 8.8
Xenforo before 2.2.16 allows CSRF.
-
High 7.5
WP STAGING PRO - Backup Duplicator & Migration <= 5.6.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Limited Local File Inclusion
The WP STAGING Pro WordPress Backup Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sub' parameter called from the WP STAGING Wor…
-
High 7.1
CVAT's export and backup-related API endpoints are susceptible to CSRF
Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) is an interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. Starting in version 2.2.0 and prior to version 2.14.3, if an attacker can trick a logged-in CVAT user into visiting a malicious URL, they can initiat…