Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
2,042 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
High 7.5
OAuth client Single Sign On for WordPress < 3.0.4 - Unauthenticated Settings Update to Authentication Bypass
The OAuth client Single Sign On WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 does not have authorisation and CSRF when updating its settings, which could allow unauthenticated attackers to update them and change the OAuth endpoints to ones they controls, allowing them to th…
-
High 7.5
Ldap WP Login / Active Directory Integration < 3.0.2 - Unauthenticated Settings Update to Auth Bypass
The Ldap WP Login / Active Directory Integration WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks when updating it's settings (which are hooked to the init action), allowing unauthenticated attackers to update them. Attackers coul…
-
High 8.8
Scripts Organizer < 3.0 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated…
-
High 7.0
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on user's settings in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.6. in ikus060/rdiffweb
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.7.
-
High 8.8
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins CONS3RT Plugin allow capturing credentials
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins CONS3RT Plugin 1.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stor…
-
High 8.8
Jenkins SCM HttpClient Plugin vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SCM HttpClient Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials…
-
High 8.8
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Worksoft Execution Manager Plugin allows capturing credentials
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Worksoft Execution Manager Plugin 10.0.3.503 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing …
-
High 8.8
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Security Inspector plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Security Inspector Plugin 117.v6eecc36919c2 and earlier allows attackers to replace the generated report stored in a per-session cache and displayed to authorized users at the .../report URL with a …
-
High 8.0
Jenkins build-publisher plugin vulnerable to cross-site request forgery
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Build-Publisher Plugin 1.22 and earlier allows attackers to replace any config.xml file on the Jenkins controller file system with an empty file by providing a crafted file name to an API endpoint.
-
High 8.8
Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.129 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified webserver using attacker-specified credentials.
-
High 8.8
A vulnerability in the ClearPass Policy Manager web-based management interface exists which exposes some endpoints to a…
-
High 8.8
TestLink v1.9.20 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /lib/plan/planView.php.
-
High 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ikus060/rdiffweb
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.3.
-
High 8.8
Unisys Data Exchange Management Studio before 6.0.IC2 and 7.x before 7.0.IC1 doesn't have an Anti-CSRF token to authent…
-
High 8.8
WordPress wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gVectors Team wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.5 at WordPress.
-
High 8.8
uContext for Clickbank <= 3.9.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The uContext for Clickbank plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is c…
-
High 8.8
uContext for Amazon <= 3.9.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The uContext for Amazon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is call…
-
High 8.8
Link Optimizer Lite <= 1.4.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The Link Optimizer Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 1.4.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the admin_page function found in the ~/admin.php file. This mak…
-
High 8.8
Stockists Manager for Woocommerce <= 1.0.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
The Stockists Manager for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the stockist_settings_main() function. This makes it possible for unau…
-
High 8.8
Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart <= 6.10.23 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings/Options Update
The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.10.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_update_plugin_params function. This makes it possib…
-
High 8.8
Banner Cycler <= 1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The Banner Cycler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce protection on the pabc_admin_slides_postback() function found in the ~/admin/admin.php file. This makes it po…
-
High 8.8
Account takeover via SSO plugins in NodeBB
NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) …
-
High 8.8
WordPress ЮKassa для WooCommerce plugin <= 2.3.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to plugin settings update
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to plugin settings update in YooMoney ЮKassa для WooCommerce plugin <= 2.3.0 at WordPress.
-
High 8.8
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in WWBN AVideo 11.6 and dev master commit 3f7c0364. A speciall…
-
High 8.0
IPTIME NAS family CSRF vulnerability
This vulnerability occured by sending a malicious POST request to a specific page while logged in random user from some family of IPTIME NAS. Remote attackers can steal root privileges by changing the password of the root through a POST request.
-
High 8.8
User Group Privilege Escalation
A carefully crafted invocation on the Image plugin could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow a group privilege escalation of the attacker's account. Further examination of this issue established that it could also …
-
High 7.1
Jenkins Coverity Plugin vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF)
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in …
-
High 8.8
FreeMind WP Browser <= 1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The FreeMind WP Browser plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.2. This is due to missing nonce protection on the FreemindOptions() function found in the ~/freemind-wp-browser.php file. This makes it…
-
High 8.8
DX Share Selection <= 1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The DX Share Selection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce protection on the dxss_admin_page() function found in the ~/dx-share-selection.php file. This makes it p…
-
High 8.8
Button Widget Smartsoft <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated atta…
-
High 8.8
AnyMind Widget <= 1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The AnyMind Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1. This is due to missing nonce protection on the createDOMStructure() function found in the ~/anymind-widget-id.php file. This makes it pos…
-
High 8.8
Free Live Chat Support <= 1.0.11 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The Free Live Chat Support plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.0.11. This is due to missing nonce protection on the livesupporti_settings() function found in the ~/livesupporti.php file. This mak…
-
High 7.1
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Jenkins Recipe Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Recipe Plugin 1.2 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified URL and parse the response as XML.
-
High 8.8
Mobile browser color select <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
The Mobile browser color select plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_update_data() function. This makes it possible for unau…
-
High 8.8
WPMK Ajax Finder <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The WPMK Ajax Finder WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the createplugin_atf_admin_setting_page() function found in the ~/inc/config/create-plugin-config.php file due to a missing nonce check which allows attackers to inject arbi…
-
High 8.8
Copify <= 1.3.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The Copify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the CopifySettings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins…
-
High 8.8
ToolBar to Share <= 2.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting
The ToolBar to Share plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin_toolbar_comparte page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to u…
-
High 7.3
Navetti PricePoint cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in Navetti PricePoint 4.6.0.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to t…
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery in Mingsoft MCMS
An issue was discovered in MCMS 5.2.7. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an administrator account via ms/basic/manager/save.do.
-
High 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery in XXL-Job
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in XXL-Job v2.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily create administrator accounts via the component /gaia-job-admin/user/add.