Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,781 results · Feed
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Smarty for WordPress Plugin <= 3.1.35 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressPage Entertainment Inc. Smarty for WordPress plugin <= 3.1.35 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress WP Emoji One Plugin <= 0.6.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Monchito.Net WP Emoji One plugin <= 0.6.0 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Exit Popups & Onsite Retargeting by OptiMonk Plugin <= 2.0.4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OptiMonk OptiMonk: Popups, Personalization & A/B Testing plugin <= 2.0.4 versions.
-
Critical 9.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Free5Gc
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability, whose exploitation could allow an attacker to perform different actions on the platform as an administrator, simply by changing the token value to "admin". It is also possible to perform POST, GET and DELETE requests …
-
Medium 6.8
WS_FTP Server Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability
In WS_FTP Server version prior to 8.8.2, the WS_FTP Server Manager interface was missing cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection on a POST transaction corresponding to a WS_FTP Server administrative function.
-
Low 3.1
Sensitive information manipulation due to cross-site request forgery. The following products are affected: Acronis Cybe…
-
Low 3.1
Sensitive information manipulation due to cross-site request forgery. The following products are affected: Acronis Cybe…
-
Medium 4.3
Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 2.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to delete Failure Causes.
-
Medium 4.3
Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 2.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified hostname and port using attacker-specified username and password.
-
Medium 5.3
CSRF in PaperCutNG Mobility Print leads to sophisticated phishing
The `PaperCutNG Mobility Print` version 1.0.3512 application allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack on an instance administrator to configure the clients host (in the "configure printer discovery" section). This is possible because the ap…
-
High 8.6
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Ormazabal products
Lack of device control over web requests in ekorCCP and ekorRCI, allowing an attacker to create customised requests to execute malicious actions when a user is logged in, affecting availability, privacy and integrity.
-
High 8.9
Socomec MOD3GP-SY-120K Cross-Site Request Forgery
Thanks to the weaknesses that the web application has at the user management level, an attacker could obtain the information from the headers that is necessary to create specially designed URLs and originate malicious actions when a legitimate user is logged …
-
High 7.3
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in usememos/memos
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.15.1.
-
Medium 6.5
Quay: cross-site request forgery (csrf) on config-editor page
A flaw was found in Quay. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks force a user to perform unwanted actions in an application. During the pentest, it was detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to CSRF. The config-editor page is used to configure …
-
High 8.8
Login with phone number <= 1.5.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to User Password Change
The Login with phone number plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.5.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'lwp_update_password_action' function. This makes it possible for unauthentica…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Contact Manager App update.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Contact Manager App 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file update.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launche…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Contact Manager App add.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Contact Manager App 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file add.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be l…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Take-Note App cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Take-Note App 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclos…
-
Low 3.5
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Frugal Testing Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Frugal Testing Plugin 1.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to Frugal Testing using attacker-specified credentials, and to retrieve test IDs and names from Frugal Testing, if a valid credentia…
-
Medium 4.3
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins AWS CodeCommit Trigger Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins AWS CodeCommit Trigger Plugin 3.0.12 and earlier allows attackers to clear the SQS queue.
-
Medium 6.5
CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Ivy Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Ivy Plugin 2.5 and earlier allows attackers to delete disabled modules.
-
High 8.1
StarTrinity Softswitch version 2023-02-16 - multiple CSRF (CWE-352)
StarTrinity Softswitch version 2023-02-16 - Multiple CSRF (CWE-352)
-
High 7.4
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-5037 SEL Grid Configurator could allow an attacker to embed instructions that could be executed by an authorized device operator. See Instruction Manual Appendix …
-
Medium 4.3
WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder <= 1.2.90 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via Save
The WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.90. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Save function. This makes it possible for unauthenticate…
-
Medium 4.3
CHP Ads Block Detector <= 3.9.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via chp_abd_action
The CHP Ads Block Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.9.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the chp_abd_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticate…
-
Medium 5.4
WP Directory Kit <= 1.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Change/Delete, Demo Import, Directory Kit Modification/Deletion via admin_page_display
The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'admin_page_display' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticate…
-
Medium 6.3
Waiting: One-click countdowns <= 0.6.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Waiting: One-click countdowns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on its AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated at…
-
Medium 4.3
WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder <= 1.2.90 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Creation
The WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the SaveCustomField function in versions up to, and including, 1.2.90. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create…
-
Medium 5.3
IBM InfoSphere Information Server cross-site request forgery
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 245400.
-
Critical 9.1
XWiki Platform vulnerable to CSRF privilege escalation/RCE via the create action
XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. The create action is vulnerable to a CSRF attack, allowing script and thus remote code execution when targeting a user with script/programming right, thus…
-
Medium 4.2
CSRF vulnerability in Fortify Plugin allow capturing credentials
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Fortify Plugin 22.1.38 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in …
-
Medium 6.5
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in wallabag/wallabag
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository wallabag/wallabag prior to 2.6.3.
-
Medium 4.3
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in wallabag/wallabag
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository wallabag/wallabag prior to 2.6.3.
-
Medium 6.5
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in fobybus/social-media-skeleton
Social media skeleton is an uncompleted/framework social media project implemented using a php, css ,javascript and html. A Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack is a type of malicious attack whereby an attacker tricks a victim into performing an action on…
-
High 7.1
WordPress WOLF Plugin <= 1.0.6 is vulnerable to CSRF leading to Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in realmag777 WOLF – WordPress Posts Bulk Editor and Manager Professional plugin <= 1.0.6 versions.
-
Medium 6.5
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, and 8800 Series with Multiplatform …
-
Medium 4.3
Jenkins Favorite View Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Favorite View Plugin 5.v77a_37f62782d and earlier allows attackers to add or remove views from another user's favorite views tab bar.
-
Medium 5.4
Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.27.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL, capturing GitHub credentials associated with an attacker-specified job.
-
Medium 4.3
Jenkins Folders Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Folders Plugin 6.846.v23698686f0f6 and earlier allows attackers to copy a view inside a folder.
-
High 8.0
Jenkins Folders Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Folders Plugin 6.846.v23698686f0f6 and earlier allows attackers to copy folders.