Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,783 results · Feed
-
Medium 5.4
Cross-site request forgery is facilitated by OpenCATS failure to require CSRF tokens in POST requests. An attacker can …
-
Medium 4.3
Download Read More Excerpt Link <= 1.6.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Download Read More Excerpt Link plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the read_more_excerpt_link_menu_options() function. This make…
-
Medium 6.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in froxlor/froxlor
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.11.
-
Medium 4.3
WP Meta SEO <= 4.5.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via 'regenerateSitemaps'
The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the regenerateSitemaps function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attac…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Sales Tracker Management System cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Sales Tracker Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/?page=user/list. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initi…
-
Medium 4.6
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in NE843 Pulsar Plus Controller
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ABB Pulsar Plus System Controller NE843_S, ABB Infinity DC Power Plant allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Pulsar Plus System Controller NE843_S : comcode 150042936; Infinity DC Power Plant: …
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in taoCMS 3.0.2 allows remote attackers to gain escalated privileges vi…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Online Pizza Ordering System cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SourceCodester Online Pizza Ordering System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file admin/ajax.php?action=save_user. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forge…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress AI ChatBot plugin <= 4.2.8 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in QuantumCloud AI ChatBot plugin <= 4.2.8 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Organization chart Plugin <= 1.4.4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WpDevArt Organization chart <= 1.4.4 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress MainWP Matomo Extension Plugin <= 4.0.4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MainWP Matomo Extension <= 4.0.4 versions.
-
High 8.8
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller and Cisco Cloud Network Controller Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) and Cisco Cloud Network Controller, formerly Cisco Cloud APIC, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request f…
-
Unscored —
Intuitive Custom Post Order < 3.1.4 - Arbitrary Menu Order Update via CSRF
The Intuitive Custom Post Order WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 lacks CSRF protection in its update-menu-order ajax action, allowing an attacker to trick any user to change the menu order via a CSRF attack
-
Medium 5.4
CSRF in add-visual endpoint
Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Tribe29's Checkmk <= 2.1.0p17, Checkmk <= 2.0.0p31, and all versions of Checkmk 1.6.0 (EOL) allow an attacker to add new visual elements to multiple pages.
-
Medium 4.3
arnoldle submitByMailPlugin edit_list.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in arnoldle submitByMailPlugin 1.0b2.9 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file edit_list.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. U…
-
Medium 5.7
apollo-portal has potential CSRF issue
Apollo is a configuration management system. Prior to version 2.1.0, a low-privileged user can create a special web page. If an authenticated portal admin visits this page, the page can silently send a request to assign new roles for that user without any con…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System Plugin <= 3.2.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WpDevArt Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System plugin <= 3.2.3 versions affects plugin forms actions (create, duplicate, edit, delete).
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Extensions For CF7 Plugin <= 2.0.8 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes Extensions For CF7 plugin <= 2.0.8 versions leads to arbitrary plugin activation.
-
Low 3.5
CSRF vulnerability in Synopsys Jenkins Coverity Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Synopsys Jenkins Coverity Plugin 3.0.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing creden…
-
Critical 9.1
Media CP Media Control Panel – CSRF
Media CP Media Control Panel latest version. CSRF possible through unspecified endpoint.
-
High 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Jenkins Azure Credentials Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Azure Credentials Plugin 253.v887e0f9e898b and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified web server.
-
Medium 6.4CVE-2022-47373 Public exploit
Reflected Cross Site Scripting in Search Functionality of Module Library
Reflected Cross Site Scripting in Search Functionality of Module Library in Pandora FMS Console v766 and lower. This vulnerability arises on the forget password functionality in which parameter username does not proper input validation/sanitization thus resul…
-
High 7.6
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in create event section
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Create event section in Pandora FMS Console v766 and lower. An attacker typically exploits this vulnerability by injecting XSS payloads on popular pages of a site or passing a link to a victim, tricking them in…
-
Medium 6.5
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baijiacms 4.1.4, allows attackers to change the password or other in…
-
Medium 5.4
Cross-Site Request Forgery in the ‘ssg/kvstore_client’ REST Endpoint in Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4, a cross-site request forgery in the Splunk Secure Gateway (SSG) app in the ‘kvstore_client’ REST endpoint lets a potential attacker update SSG KV store collections using an HTTP GET request.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Material Design Icons for Page Builders Plugin <= 1.4.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Photon WP Material Design Icons for Page Builders plugin <= 1.4.2 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Quiz And Survey Master Plugin <= 8.0.7 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ExpressTech Quiz And Survey Master – Best Quiz, Exam and Survey Plugin for WordPress plugin <= 8.0.7 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Ecwid Shopping Cart Plugin <= 6.11.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ecwid Ecommerce Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin <= 6.11.3 versions.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress WP Tabs Plugin <= 2.1.14 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShapedPlugin WP Tabs – Responsive Tabs Plugin for WordPress plugin <= 2.1.14 versions.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress FV Flowplayer Video Player Plugin <= 7.5.30.7212 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FolioVision FV Flowplayer Video Player plugin <= 7.5.30.7212 versions.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Corona Virus (COVID-19) Banner & Live Data Plugin <= 1.7.0.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Orchestrated Corona Virus (COVID-19) Banner & Live Data plugin <= 1.7.0.6 versions.
-
High 8.8
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wired/Wireless LAN Pan/Tilt Network Camera CS-WMV02G all versions al…
-
High 8.8
LexisNexis Firco Compliance Link 3.7 allows CSRF.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Optinly Plugin <= 1.0.15 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in OptinlyHQ Optinly – Exit Intent, Newsletter Popups, Gamification & Opt-in Forms plugin <= 1.0.15 versions.
-
Medium 6.4
A Cross Site Request Forgery issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 15.6.7, all versio…
-
High 8.8
PowerPath Management Appliance with versions 3.3 & 3.2*, 3.1 & 3.0* contains a Cross-site Request Forgery vulnerability…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress SeoSamba for WordPress Webmasters Plugin <= 1.0.5 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SeoSamba for WordPress Webmasters plugin <= 1.0.5 versions.
-
Medium 5.4
Wicked Folders <= 2.18.16 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via ajax_edit_folder
The Wicked Folders plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.18.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_edit_folder function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated at…
-
Medium 5.4
Wicked Folders <= 2.18.16 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via ajax_save_state
The Wicked Folders plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.18.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_save_state function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated att…
-
Medium 5.4
Wicked Folders <= 2.18.16 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via ajax_clone_folder
The Wicked Folders plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.18.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_clone_folder function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated a…