Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,780 results · Feed
-
High 7.1
WWBN AVideo Vulnerable to CSRF in Admin JSON Endpoints (Category CRUD, Plugin Update Script)
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 29.0 and prior, three admin-only JSON endpoints — `objects/categoryAddNew.json.php`, `objects/categoryDelete.json.php`, and `objects/pluginRunUpdateScript.json.php` — enforce only a role check (`Catego…
-
High 8.3
WWBN AVideo has CSRF in configurationUpdate.json.php Enables Full Site Configuration Takeover Including Encoder URL and SMTP Credentials
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 29.0 and prior, `objects/configurationUpdate.json.php` (also routed via `/updateConfig`) persists dozens of global site settings from `$_POST` but protects the endpoint only with `User::isAdmin()`. It …
-
Medium 6.1
goshs: CSRF in state-changing GET routes enables authenticated file deletion and directory creation
goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. From 2.0.0-beta.4 to 2.0.0-beta.5, goshs contains a cross-site request forgery issue in its state-changing HTTP GET routes. An external attacker can cause an already authenticated browser to trigger destructive actio…
-
Medium 5.4
FreeScout's Mailbox OAuth disconnect uses a state-changing GET and is CSRFable
FreeScout is a free self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to version 1.8.215, the mailbox OAuth disconnect action is implemented as `GET /mailbox/oauth-disconnect/{id}/{in_out}/{provider}`. It removes stored OAuth metadata from the mailbox and then …
-
Medium 5.3
Other issue in the Networking: DNS component
Other issue in the Networking: DNS component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 150 and Thunderbird 150.
-
Medium 6.5
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: postMessage component
Mitigation bypass in the DOM: postMessage component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 150 and Thunderbird 150.
-
Medium 6.3
Dovestones Softwares AD Self Update <4.0.0.5 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The affected endpoint …
-
Medium 5.5
Nginx-UI vulnerable to Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) via missing origin validation on all WebSocket endpoints
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to version 2.3.5, all WebSocket endpoints in nginx-ui use a gorilla/websocket Upgrader with CheckOrigin unconditionally returning true, allowing Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH). Combined …
-
Medium 4.3
ComfyUI server.py create_origin_only_middleware cross-site request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in ComfyUI up to 0.13.0. This affects the function create_origin_only_middleware of the file server.py. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been…
-
Medium 5.4
Apache Airflow Providers Keycloak: OAuth Login CSRF — Missing State Parameter in Keycloak Auth Manager
The Keycloak authentication manager in `apache-airflow-providers-keycloak` did not generate or validate the OAuth 2.0 `state` parameter on the login / login-callback flow, and did not use PKCE. An attacker with a Keycloak account in the same realm could deliv…
-
High 8.1
ChurchCRM: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SelectDelete.php Leading to Permanent Data Deletion
ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. In versions prior to 7.2.0, the family record deletion endpoint (SelectDelete.php) performs permanent, irreversible deletion of family records and all associated data via a plain GET request with no CSRF t…
-
High 7.0
Cross-Site Request Forgery in PAC4J
PAC4J is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A malicious attacker can craft a specially designed website which, when visited by a user, will automatically submit a forged cross-site request with a token whose hash collides with the victim's legit…
-
Medium 4.3
CMS für Motorrad Werkstätten <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The cms-fuer-motorrad-werkstaetten plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on all eight AJAX deletion handlers: vehicles_cfmw_d_vehicle, contacts_cfmw_d_co…
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Smart Online Order for Clover plugin <= 1.6.0 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZAYTECH Smart Online Order for Clover clover-online-orders allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Smart Online Order for Clover: from n/a through <= 1.6.0.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Userpro plugin < 5.1.11 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DeluxeThemes Userpro userpro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Userpro: from n/a through < 5.1.11.
-
Medium 6.1
Product Pricing Table by WooBeWoo <= 1.1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored XSS and Pricing Table Deletion
The Product Pricing Table by WooBeWoo plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the updateLabel() and remove() functions. This makes it…
-
High 8.1
WordPress Contact Form by WPForms plugin <= 1.10.0.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Contact Form by WPForms wpforms-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Contact Form by WPForms: from n/a through <= 1.10.0.2.
-
Medium 6.8
CSRF Protection Bypass Allows Updating a User's Authentication Method
Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.12, 11.5.x <= 11.5.0, 11.4.x <= 11.4.2, 11.3.x <= 11.3.2 fail to validate CSRF tokens on an authentication endpoint which allows an attacker to update a user's authentication method via a CSRF attack by tricking a user int…
-
Medium 6.1
OPEN-BRAIN <= 0.5.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The OPEN-BRAIN plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.0. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings form in the func_page_main() function. This makes it possible for unauthenti…
-
Medium 4.3
Petje.af <= 2.1.8 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Account Deletion via 'petjeaf_disconnect' AJAX Action
The Petje.af plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 2.1.8. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ajax_revoke_token() function which handles the 'petjeaf_disconnect' AJAX action. The functi…
-
Medium 4.3
Inquiry form to posts or pages <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'inq_header' Parameter
The Inquiry Form to Posts or Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in version 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin settings update handler, combined with insufficien…
-
Medium 4.3
Pachno 1.0.6 Cross-Site Request Forgery via State-Changing Endpoints
Pachno 1.0.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform arbitrary actions in authenticated user context by exploiting missing CSRF protections on state-changing endpoints. Attackers can craft malicious requests target…
-
Medium 4.3
Heatmiser Wifi Thermostat 1.7 Cross-Site Request Forgery
Heatmiser Wifi Thermostat 1.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrator credentials by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting the networ…
-
High 7.1
ResourceSpace 8.6 SQL Injection via collection_edit.php
ResourceSpace 8.6 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the keywords parameter in collection_edit.php. Attackers can submit POST requests with crafted S…
-
Medium 4.3
FoundationAgents MetaGPT Mineflayer HTTP API index.js evaluateCode cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was determined in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. The impacted element is the function evaluateCode of the file metagpt/environment/minecraft/mineflayer/index.js of the component Mineflayer HTTP API. Executing a manipulation can lead to …
-
Medium 4.3
Aruba HiSpeed Cache <= 3.0.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Reset
The Aruba HiSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the `ahsc_ajax_reset_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthentic…
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Phpbb phbb3 v.3.3.15 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via …
-
Medium 4.3
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Phpbb phbb3 v.3.3.15 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via …
-
Medium 4.3
Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had co…
-
Medium 5.9
Zammad has Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in OAuth callback endpoints
Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.0.1 and 6.5.4, the OAuth callback endpoints for Microsoft, Google, and Facebook external credentials do not validate a CSRF state parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.1 an…
-
Medium 5.4
Advanced CF7 DB <= 2.0.9 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Form Entry Deletion
The Advanced Contact form 7 DB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'vsz_cf7_save_setting_callback' function. This makes it po…
-
Medium 6.5
BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net <= 1.1.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Product Data Modification
The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_redraw_…
-
Medium 4.3
BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net <= 1.1.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Taxonomy Term Deletion
The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_delete_…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress RT-Theme 18 | Extensions plugin <= 2.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in stmcan RT-Theme 18 | Extensions rt18-extensions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RT-Theme 18 | Extensions: from n/a through <= 2.5.
-
High 7.1
WordPress Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce plugin <= 4.3.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.3.3.
-
Medium 6.5
WordPress Blackfyre theme <= 2.5.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Skywarrior Blackfyre blackfyre allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Blackfyre: from n/a through <= 2.5.4.
-
Critical 9.6
WordPress Theme Editor plugin <= 3.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to Remote Code Execution vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mndpsingh287 Theme Editor theme-editor allows Code Injection.This issue affects Theme Editor: from n/a through <= 3.2.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Grand Magazine theme <= 3.5.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Magazine grandmagazine allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Magazine: from n/a through <= 3.5.5.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Grand Portfolio theme <= 3.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Portfolio grandportfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Portfolio: from n/a through <= 3.3.
-
Medium 6.5
WordPress Grand Car Rental theme <= 3.6.9 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Car Rental grandcarrental allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Car Rental: from n/a through <= 3.6.9.