Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,780 results · Feed
-
Medium 4.3
Image Slider by Ays- Responsive Slider and Carousel <= 2.7.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Slider Deletion
The Image Slider by Ays- Responsive Slider and Carousel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bulk delete functionality. This m…
-
High 8.0
OpenPLC_V3 Cross-Site Request Forgery
OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack due to the absence of proper CSRF validation. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a maliciously crafted link, potentially enablin…
-
Medium 4.3
Events Manager – Calendar, Bookings, Tickets, and more! <= 7.2.2.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Location Deletion
The Events Manager – Calendar, Bookings, Tickets, and more! plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'location_delete' action. T…
-
Medium 4.3
Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking <= 4.9.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Data Export
The Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'ays_sccp_results_export_file' AJAX action. Thi…
-
Medium 4.3
Construction Light < 1.6.8 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Plugin Activation
The Construction Light WordPress theme before 1.6.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF when activating via an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to activate arbitrary .
-
Medium 4.3
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GroupSession Free edition prior to ver5.3.0, GroupSession byCloud pr…
-
Medium 4.3
Simple Theme Changer <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Theme Switcher Configuration Update
The Simple Theme Changer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's …
-
Medium 4.3
Rabbit Hole <= 1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Reset
The Rabbit Hole plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's reset functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated at…
-
Medium 4.3
Upcoming for Calendly <= 1.2.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Upcoming for Calendly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated at…
-
Medium 4.3
Purchase and Expense Manager <= 1.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Purchase Record Deletion
The Purchase and Expense Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'sup_pt_handle_deletion' function. This makes it possible for unauthe…
-
Medium 4.3
Animated Pixel Marquee Creator <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via 'marquee' Parameter
The Animated Pixel Marquee Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the 'marquee' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the marquee deletion function. This makes i…
-
Medium 4.3
Truefy Embed <= 1.1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to 'truefy_embed_options_update' Settings Update
The Truefy Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'truefy_embed_options_update' settings update action. This makes it possible for unau…
-
Medium 4.3
Kirim.Email WooCommerce Integration <= 1.2.9 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Kirim.Email WooCommerce Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin's settings page. This makes it possible for unauthentic…
-
Medium 4.3
Resource Library for Logged In Users <= 1.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Multiple Administrative Actions
The Resource Library for Logged In Users plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple administrative functions. This makes it possible for unaut…
-
Medium 4.3
IMAQ Core <= 1.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to URL Structure Update
The IMAQ Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the URL structure settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated …
-
Medium 4.3
Coding Blocks <= 1.1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers …
-
Medium 4.3
Foxtool All-in-One: Contact chat button, Custom login, Media optimize images <= 2.5.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Google OAuth Connection
The Foxtool All-in-One: Contact chat button, Custom login, Media optimize images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the foxtool_…
-
Medium 4.3
BMLT WordPress Plugin <= 3.11.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Creation and Deletion
The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it p…
-
High 8.8
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /admin/admin.inc.php component of EasyImages 2.0 v2.8.6 and below allows att…
-
Low 3.5
TableProgressTracking's missing CSRF protection allows unauthorized state changes
TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authe…
-
High 8.6
UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 Cross-Site Request Forgery via User Management
UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to the /qu…
-
High 8.6
All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 Cross-Site Request Forgery via User Management
All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to …
-
Medium 6.9
SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 Cross-Site Request Forgery via User Creation
SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a for…
-
High 7.0
1Panel CSRF Web Port Configuration Change
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a…
-
Medium 5.1
1Panel CSRF Panel Name Modification
1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attac…
-
Low 3.5
Jenkins has a CSRF vulnerability on the login form
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins 2.540 and earlier, LTS 2.528.2 and earlier allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker's account.
-
High 7.0
1Panel CSRF in Change Username Functionality Allows Account Lockout
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Username functionality available from the settings panel (/settings/panel). The endpoint does not implement CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or O…
-
High 8.5
Selea Targa IP Camera Cross-Site Request Forgery via Admin Creation
Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to add a new admin user with full syst…
-
Medium 6.9
STVS ProVision Cross-Site Request Forgery (Add Admin)
STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web sites to trigger the forge request, al…
-
Medium 5.3
OpenBMCS Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via sendFeedback.php
OpenBMCS 2.4 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting the sendFeedback.php endpoint. Attackers can submit malicious requests to trigger unintended actions, such as sending emails or mo…
-
Medium 4.3
Advanced Product Fields (Product Addons) for WooCommerce <= 1.6.17 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Product Field Group Duplication and Publication
The Advanced Product Fields (Product Addons) for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.17. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'maybe_duplicate' function.…
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress WP Fast Cache plugin <= 1.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Taylor Hawkes WP Fast Cache allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Fast Cache: from n/a through 1.5.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress GiveWP plugin <= 4.13.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StellarWP GiveWP give allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GiveWP: from n/a through <= 4.13.1.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress KALLYAS theme < 4.25.0 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hogash KALLYAS kallyas allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects KALLYAS: from n/a through < 4.25.0.
-
High 7.1
WordPress New User Approve plugin <= 3.2.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal New User Approve new-user-approve allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects New User Approve: from n/a through <= 3.2.3.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress WP Hotel Booking plugin <= 2.2.8 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Hotel Booking wp-hotel-booking allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Hotel Booking: from n/a through <= 2.2.8.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress WP Flashy Marketing Automation plugin <= 2.0.8 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Flashyapp WP Flashy Marketing Automation wp-flashy-marketing-automation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Flashy Marketing Automation: from n/a through <= 2.0.8.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Just TinyMCE Custom Styles plugin <= 1.2.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Social Photo Fetcher plugin <= 3.0.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JK Social Photo Fetcher facebook-photo-fetcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Photo Fetcher: from n/a through <= 3.0.4.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress SMTP Mail plugin <= 1.3.51 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in photoboxone SMTP Mail smtp-mail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through <= 1.3.51.