Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,780 results · Feed
-
Medium 4.3
Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 <= 2.4.13 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Setting Reset
The Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpcf7cf_admin_init function. This makes it possibl…
-
Medium 4.2
ProcessWire Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situa…
-
High 8.8
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Spina CMS v.2.18.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileg…
-
Critical 9.6
Spina CMS v2.18.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the URI /admin/layout.
-
Medium 6.1CVE-2024-39090 Public exploit
The PHPGurukul Online Shopping Portal Project version 2.0 contains a vulnerability that allows Cross-Site Request Forge…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Cooked Plugin - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Apply Template to All Recipes
Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability …
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Cooked Plugin - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Default Recipe Template Save
Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability …
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Cooked Plugin - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Recipe Template Reset
Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability …
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Cooked Plugin - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Get Recipe IDs
Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an…
-
High 8.8CVE-2024-40119 Public exploit
Nepstech Wifi Router xpon (terminal) model NTPL-Xpon1GFEVN v.1.0 Firmware V2.0.1 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery …
-
Medium 6.8
Cross Site Request Forgery was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed write in a user owned repository
A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed write operations on a victim-owned repository by exploiting incorrect request types. A mitigating factor is that the attacker would have to be a trusted GitHub Enterprise Server us…
-
Low 2.7
An arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in ThinkSAAS v3.7 allows attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted req…
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress SociallyViral theme <= 1.0.10 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MyThemeShop SociallyViral.This issue affects SociallyViral: from n/a through 1.0.10.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Patricia Lite theme <= 1.2.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VolThemes Patricia Lite.This issue affects Patricia Lite: from n/a through 1.2.3.
-
High 7.4
WordPress Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium) plugin <= 2.21.13 - CSRF Leading to Arbitrary File Deletion vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium).This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium): from n/a through 2.21.13.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress plugin <= 2.24.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Internal Link Juicer Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress.This issue affects Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress: from n/a through 2.24.3.
-
High 7.1
WordPress Comment Reply Email plugin <= 1.3 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPJohnny, zerOneIT Comment Reply Email allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Comment Reply Email: from n/a through 1.3.
-
High 7.1
WordPress AliExpress Dropshipping with AliNext Lite plugin <= 3.4.6 - CSRF to XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in guru-aliexpress AliNext ali2woo-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AliNext: from n/a through <= 3.4.6.
-
Medium 4.3
Event post <= 5.9.10 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Event post plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized bulk metadata update due to a missing nonce check on the save_bulkdatas function in all versions up to, and including, 5.9.10. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update pos…
-
Medium 4.3
SourceCodester Employee and Visitor Gate Pass Logging System Users.php save_users cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Employee and Visitor Gate Pass Logging System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function save_users of the file Users.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request for…
-
High 8.8
1-Click compromize via CSRF
Cross-Site request forgery in Checkmk < 2.3.0p8, < 2.2.0p29, < 2.1.0p45, and <= 2.0.0p39 (EOL) could lead to 1-click compromize of the site.
-
High 8.7
Insecure handling of GET argument in Phoniebox
Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malicious requests to multiple hosts on the l…
-
Low 3.1
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ajaxterm module of Webmin versions prior to 2.003. If this vulnerabi…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/serverFile_deal.php…
-
Medium 6.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/moneyRecord_deal.ph…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/softBak_deal.php?mu…
-
Medium 6.3
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/memberOnline_deal.p…
-
High 8.8
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/dbBakMySQL_deal.php…
-
High 7.2
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) weaknesses [CWE-352] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an…
-
Medium 4.3
Just Custom Fields <= 3.3.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via AJAX actions
The Just Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several AJAX function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated atta…
-
Medium 5.3
Pricing Table <= 2.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via ajax()
The Pricing Table plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers t…
-
High 8.8
ScrollTo Top <= 1.2.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The ScrollTo Top plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'options_page' function. This m…
-
High 8.8
ScrollTo Bottom <= 1.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The ScrollTo Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'options_page' function. Thi…
-
High 8.8
Advanced AJAX Page Loader <= 2.7.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Advanced AJAX Page Loader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.7.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'admin_init_AAPL' function and missing file type va…
-
High 8.8
Attachment File Icons (AF Icons) <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Attachment File Icons (AF Icons) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'afi_overview' function and missing file type …
-
High 8.8
Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 <= 4.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload
The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'wp_cf7_pd…
-
High 8.8
Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 <= 4.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Deletion
The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation and the plugin not properly validating a file or i…
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Cliengo – Chatbot plugin <= 3.0.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cliengo Cliengo – Chatbot cliengo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cliengo – Chatbot: from n/a through <= 3.0.4.
-
High 8.8
Lime Survey <= 6.5.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The YII_CSRF_TOKEN is only checked when passe…
-
Medium 5.3
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userScore_deal.php?…