Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,780 results · Feed
-
Medium 4.3
Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin <= 1.3.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthe…
-
Medium 4.3
ADFO – Custom data in admin dashboard <= 1.9.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The ADFO – Custom data in admin dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions hooked via the controller() funct…
-
Medium 4.3
hostel <= 1.1.5.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Hostel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when managing rooms. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create…
-
Medium 4.3
Soccer Engine – Soccer Plugin for WordPress <= 1.12 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Soccer Engine – Soccer Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.12. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving match and team settings. This makes i…
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress DS Site Message plugin <= 1.14.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in divSpot DS Site Message.This issue affects DS Site Message: from n/a through 1.14.4.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress WP Favorite Posts plugin <= 1.6.8 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Huseyin Berberoglu WP Favorite Posts.This issue affects WP Favorite Posts: from n/a through 1.6.8.
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager plugin <= 1.5.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager barcode-scanner-lite-pos-to-manage-products-inventory-and-orders.This issue affects Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Mana…
-
Medium 5.7
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.7 before 16.9.7, all versions starting from 16.10 before 16.10.5, all versions starting from 16.11 before 16.11.2. An attacker could force a user with an active SAML session to approve a…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS sys_safe.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in DedeCMS 5.7. Affected is an unknown function of the file /src/dede/sys_safe.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS sys_multiserv.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in DedeCMS 5.7. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /src/dede/sys_multiserv.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS sys_group_edit.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in DedeCMS 5.7. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /src/dede/sys_group_edit.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has b…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS sys_group_add.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in DedeCMS 5.7. This affects an unknown part of the file /src/dede/sys_group_add.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit ha…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS sys_info.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in DedeCMS 5.7. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /src/dede/sys_info.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS mytag_edit.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in DedeCMS 5.7. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /src/dede/mytag_edit.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched re…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS mytag_add.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in DedeCMS 5.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /src/dede/mytag_add.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The explo…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS tpl.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was found in DedeCMS 5.7 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /src/dede/tpl.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been …
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS shops_delivery.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS 5.7 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /src/dede/shops_delivery.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The expl…
-
Medium 4.3
DedeCMS member_type.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in DedeCMS 5.7. This affects an unknown part of the file /src/dede/member_type.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The explo…
-
High 7.1
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision, version 7.20. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick registered users into performing critical actions, such as adding and updating accounts, due to lack of proper sanitisation of th…
-
Medium 4.3
WordPress Restaurant and Cafe theme <= 1.2.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Restaurant and Cafe.This issue affects Restaurant and Cafe: from n/a through 1.2.1.
-
High 7.1
WordPress Popup Box plugin <= 4.1.2 - CSRF to XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Popup Box Team Popup box allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Popup box: from n/a through 4.1.2.
-
High 7.5CVE-2024-34069 Public exploit
Werkzeug's improper usage of a pathname and improper CSRF protection results in the remote command execution
Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a…
-
Medium 5.4
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/readDeal.php?mudi=u…
-
High 8.1
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/readDeal.php?mudi=c…
-
Critical 9.8
An issue was discovered in WikibaseLexeme in MediaWiki before 1.39.6, 1.40.x before 1.40.2, and 1.41.x before 1.41.1. L…
-
Medium 5.4
Stop Spammers Security | Block Spam Users, Comments, Forms <= 2024.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via sfs_process
The Stop Spammers Security | Block Spam Users, Comments, Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2024.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sfs_process AJAX action. …
-
Medium 4.3
CM Tooltip Glossary – Powerful Glossary Plugin <= 4.2.11 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The CM Tooltip Glossary – Powerful Glossary Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible…
-
Medium 4.3
SVS Pricing Tables <= 1.0.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Pricing Table Deletion
The SVS Pricing Tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the deletePricingTable() function. This makes it possible for unauthen…
-
Medium 4.3
Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin <= 1.8.9 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it…
-
Medium 4.3
Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin <= 1.8.9 - Missing Authorization
The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access to functionality due to a missing capability check on several functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This makes it possible …
-
Medium 6.1
Delete Custom Fields <= 0.3.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Post Meta Deletion
The Delete Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_delete_field() function. This makes it possible for unauthe…
-
Medium 5.3
Paid Memberships Pro <= 3.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Paid Memberships Pro – Content Restriction, User Registration, & Paid Subscriptions plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the p…
-
Medium 4.3
SVS Pricing Tables <= 1.0.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Pricing Table Edit/Creation
The SVS Pricing Tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the savePricingTable() function. This makes it possible for unauthenti…
-
Medium 4.3
5280 Bootstrap Modal Contact Form <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Bulk Delete Messages
The 5280 Bootstrap Modal Contact Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in class-sbmm-list-table.php. This makes it possible for una…
-
Medium 4.3
Easy Restaurant Table Booking <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Easy Restaurant Table Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticat…
-
Low 2.6
CSRF in firebase-tools emulator suite
This vulnerability was a potential CSRF attack. When running the Firebase emulator suite, there is an export endpoint that is used normally to export data from running emulators. If a user was running the emulator and navigated to a malicious website with the…
-
Critical 9.6
WordPress Xserver Migrator plugin <= 1.6.1 - CSRF to Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Arbitrary File Upload in Xserver Migrator.This issue affects Xserver Migrator: from n/a through 1.6.1.
-
Medium 4.3
Popup Box < 2.2.7 - Popup Deletion via CSRF
The Popup Box WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting popups via CSRF attacks
-
Medium 5.9
Modal Window < 5.3.10 - Modal Deletion via CSRF
The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.3.10 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting modals, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack
-
Medium 4.3
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TvRock 0.9t8a. If a logged-in user of TVRock accesses a speci…