Weakness (CWE)
CWE-784: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking in a Security Decision
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of a cookie, but it does not properly ensure that the cookie is valid for the associated user.
How to prevent it (4 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Avoid using cookie data for a security-related decision.
-
Implementation
Perform thorough input validation (i.e.: server side validation) on the cookie data if you're going to use it for a security related decision.
-
Architecture and Design
Add integrity checks to detect tampering.
-
Architecture and Design
Protect critical cookies from replay attacks, since cross-site scripting or other attacks may allow attackers to steal a strongly-encrypted cookie that also passes integrity checks. This mitigation applies to cookies that should only be valid during a single transaction or session. By enforcing timeouts, you may limit the scope of an attack. As part of your integrity check, use an unpredictable, server-side value that is not exposed to the client.
Source: MITRE CWE-784
1 result · Clear filters · Feed
-
Medium 6.5
WP 2FA with Telegram <= 3.0 - Two-Factor Authentication Bypass
The WP 2FA with Telegram plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Two-Factor Authentication Bypass in versions up to, and including, 3.0. This is due to the two-factor code being stored in a cookie, which makes it possible to bypass two-factor authentication.