Weakness (CWE)
CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
More detail
Without sufficient encryption, integrity checking, or other mechanism, any input that originates from an outsider cannot be trusted.
How to prevent it (5 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
Ensure that the system definitively and unambiguously keeps track of its own state and user state and has rules defined for legitimate state transitions. Do not allow any application user to affect state directly in any way other than through legitimate actions leading to state transitions.
If information must be stored on the client, do not do so without encryption and integrity checking, or otherwise having a mechanism on the server side to catch tampering. Use a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm, such as Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) [REF-529]. Apply this against the state or sensitive data that has to be exposed, which can guarantee the integrity of the data - i.e., that the data has not been modified. Ensure that a strong hash function is used (CWE-328).
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
With a stateless protocol such as HTTP, use a framework that maintains the state for you.
Examples include ASP.NET View State [REF-756] and the OWASP ESAPI Session Management feature [REF-45].
Be careful of language features that provide state support, since these might be provided as a convenience to the programmer and may not be considering security.
-
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
-
Operation, Implementation
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
-
Architecture and Design, Implementation
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Identify all inputs that are used for security decisions and determine if you can modify the design so that you do not have to rely on submitted inputs at all. For example, you may be able to keep critical information about the user's session on the server side instead of recording it within external data.
Source: MITRE CWE-807
6 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Low 2.1
KaTeX: Existing prototype pollution can bypass trust restrictions
KaTeX is a fast, easy-to-use JavaScript library for TeX math rendering on the web. From 0.11.0 until 0.18.2, KaTeX uses ordinary JavaScript property access for the renderer options object, the trust setting, default and processor setting metadata, and namespa…
-
Low 3.3
deepseek-ai deepseek-harness dsh index.ts reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision
A vulnerability was identified in deepseek-ai deepseek-harness up to 0.1.5-rc.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file packages/e2b/e2b/src/index.ts of the component dsh. The manipulation of the argument E2B_API_KEY leads to reliance on untrusted inputs…
-
Low 2.8
agentverus agentverus-scanner context.js isSecurityDefenseSkill reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision
A vulnerability was found in agentverus agentverus-scanner up to 0.8.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function isSecurityDefenseSkill of the file dist/scanner/analyzers/context.js. Performing a manipulation results in reliance on untrusted inputs in a…
-
Low 3.7
Multiple vulnerabilities in SAP Business AI Platform (Approuter)
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate tenant context in inbound requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to spoof the tenant context under conditions not fully within their control. Successful exploitation could allow…
-
Low 2.9
OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Access Control Bypass via Proxied Remote Request Misclassification
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 misclassifies proxied remote requests as loopback connections in the diffs viewer when allowRemoteViewer is disabled, allowing unauthorized access. Attackers can bypass access controls by sending proxied requests that are incorrectly…
-
Low 2.3
Anubis has a bot protection bypass when a sophisticated attacker asks to pass a challenge of difficulty 0
Anubis is a tool that allows administrators to protect bots against AI scrapers through bot-checking heuristics and a proof-of-work challenge to discourage scraping from multiple IP addresses. Anubis allows attackers to bypass the bot protection by requesting…