Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it (5 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
-
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
-
Architecture and Design
For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
-
System Configuration, Installation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
Source: MITRE CWE-863
4,277 results · Feed
-
Low 3.1
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Discover.
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Discover.
-
Medium 5.6
Bake filesystem path entitlements approval can be skipped in some multi-target builds
In Docker Buildx versions v0.19.0 through v0.38.0, an untrusted Bake definition that builds multiple targets together may expose files accessible to the Buildx client without the expected fs.read approval. Under certain conditions, filesystem paths from some …
-
Medium 5.4
Incorrect authorization in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin…
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in TrustedTypes in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web…
-
Medium 5.1
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a local attacker leveraging social engi…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social …
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging soc…
-
Medium 4.3
Incorrect authorization in ORB in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass site isolati…
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in CORS in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social eng…
-
Medium 4.3
Incorrect authorization in WebUI in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system acc…
-
Medium 4.3
Incorrect authorization in History in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social …
-
Medium 5.4
Incorrect authorization in Isolated in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI eleme…
-
Medium 4.3
Incorrect authorization in HID in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system acces…
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin …
-
Critical 9.8
Incorrect authorization in Chromoting in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a local attacker to bypass system…
-
Medium 4.3
Incorrect authorization in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging …
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in Forms in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin…
-
Medium 5.3
Incorrect authorization in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compro…
-
High 8.1
Incorrect authorization in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compro…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Permissions in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker …
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Views in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging…
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin …
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social…
-
High 8.1
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised t…
-
Critical 9.6
Incorrect authorization in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross…
-
High 8.1
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised t…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system …
-
High 8.3
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had comprom…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Autofill AI in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cros…
-
Medium 5.3
Incorrect authorization in Proxy Auth in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed an adjacent attacker to obtain se…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in API in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system acces…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass syste…
-
Medium 6.5
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging soci…
-
High 8.1
Incorrect authorization in CacheStorage in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compr…
-
High 7.4
Incorrect authorization in API in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised th…
-
Critical 9.6
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging soci…
-
Critical 9.6
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging soci…
-
Critical 9.6
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging soci…
-
High 8.8
Incorrect authorization in BackgroundFetch in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass …