Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

Base

The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

    For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.

  2. Architecture and Design

    If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.

    Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedures. These features should accept parameters or variables and support strong typing. Do not dynamically construct and execute query strings within these features using "exec" or similar functionality, since this may re-introduce the possibility of SQL injection. [REF-867]

  3. Architecture and Design, Operation

    Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

    Specifically, follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. The database users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account. If the requirements of the system indicate that a user can read and modify their own data, then limit their privileges so they cannot read/write others' data. Use the strictest permissions possible on all database objects, such as execute-only for stored procedures.

  4. Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

  5. Implementation

    While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).

    Instead of building a new implementation, such features may be available in the database or programming language. For example, the Oracle DBMS_ASSERT package can check or enforce that parameters have certain properties that make them less vulnerable to SQL injection. For MySQL, the mysql_real_escape_string() API function is available in both C and PHP.

  6. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

    When constructing SQL query strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.

    Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing SQL injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent SQL injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, the name "O'Reilly" would likely pass the validation step, since it is a common last name in the English language. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the database because it contains the "'" apostrophe character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the apostrophe might reduce the risk of SQL injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the wrong name would be recorded.

    When feasible, it may be safest to disallow meta-characters entirely, instead of escaping them. This will provide some defense in depth. After the data is entered into the database, later processes may neglect to escape meta-characters before use, and you may not have control over those processes.

  7. Architecture and Design

    When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.

  8. Implementation

    Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.

    If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.

    Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

    In the context of SQL Injection, error messages revealing the structure of a SQL query can help attackers tailor successful attack strings.

Source: MITRE CWE-89

241 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2023-31717 Public exploit

    FUXA SQL Injection vulnerability

    A SQL Injection attack in FUXA <= 1.1.12 allows exfiltration of confidential information from the database.

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2023-34133 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 73%

    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in SonicWall GMS and…

  • High 8.6
    CVE-2023-36808 Public exploit EPSS 48%

    GLPI vulnerable to SQL injection through Computer Virtual Machine information

    GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 0.80 and prior to version 10.0.8, Computer Virtual Machine form and GLPI inventory request can be used to perform a SQL injection attack. Version 10.0.8 has a patch for this issue. A…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-30625 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 86%

    rudder-server vulnerable to SQL Injection

    rudder-server is part of RudderStack, an open source Customer Data Platform (CDP). Versions of rudder-server prior to 1.3.0-rc.1 are vulnerable to SQL injection. This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to the `rudder` role in PostgresSQL having…

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2023-31702 Public exploit

    SQL injection in the View User Profile in MicroWorld eScan Management Console 14.0.1400.2281 allows remote attacker to …

  • High 7.3
    CVE-2023-2594 Public exploit

    SourceCodester Food Ordering Management System Registration sql injection

    A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in SourceCodester Food Ordering Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the component Registration. The manipulation of the argument username leads to sql injection. It is possible…

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2023-2114 Public exploit EPSS 45%

    NEX-Forms < 8.4 - Admin+ SQL Injection

    The NEX-Forms WordPress plugin before 8.4 does not properly escape the `table` parameter, which is populated with user input, before concatenating it to an SQL query.

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-31433 Public exploit

    A SQL injection issue in Logbuch in evasys before 8.2 Build 2286 and 9.x before 9.0 Build 2401 allows authenticated att…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-29849 Public exploit

    Bang Resto 1.0 was discovered to contain multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities via the btnMenuItemID, itemID, itemPric…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-26876 Public exploit

    SQL injection vulnerability found in Piwigo v.13.5.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via …

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2021-36520 Public exploit

    A SQL injection vulnerability in I-Tech Trainsmart r1044 exists via a evaluation/assign-evaluation?id= URI.

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-45030 Public exploit

    A SQL injection vulnerability in rConfig 3.9.7 exists via lib/ajaxHandlers/ajaxCompareGetCmdDates.php?command= (this ma…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-24788 Public exploit

    NotrinosERP vulnerable to SQL Injection

    NotrinosERP v0.7 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the OrderNumber parameter at /NotrinosERP/sales/customer_delivery.php.

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2023-1545 Public exploit

    SQL Injection in nilsteampassnet/teampass

    SQL Injection in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.0.23.

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2023-1211 Public exploit

    SQL Injection in phpipam/phpipam

    SQL Injection in GitHub repository phpipam/phpipam prior to v1.5.2.

  • High 7.8
    CVE-2022-46623 Public exploit

    Judging Management System v1.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the username parameter.

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-39066 Public exploit EPSS 27%

    There is a SQL injection vulnerability in ZTE MF286R. Due to insufficient validation of the input parameters of the pho…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-42098 Public exploit

    KLiK SocialMediaWebsite version v1.0.1 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the profile.php.

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2021-38819 Public exploit

    A SQL injection vulnerability exits on the Simple Image Gallery System 1.0 application through "id" parameter on the al…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-37202 Public exploit

    JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via /admin/advicefeedback/list

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-37208 Public exploit

    JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection. These interfaces do not use the same component, nor do they have filte…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-37209 Public exploit

    JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is affected by: SQL Injection. These interfaces do not use the same component, nor do they have filter…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2022-37205 Public exploit

    JFinal CMS 5.1.0 is affected by: SQL Injection. These interfaces do not use the same component, nor do they have filter…

  • High 8.1
    CVE-2022-31101 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 23%

    SQL Injection in prestashop/blockwishlist

    prestashop/blockwishlist is a prestashop extension which adds a block containing the customer's wishlists. In affected versions an authenticated customer can perform SQL injection. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are …

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2022-26986 Public exploit

    SQL injection in ImpressCMS

    SQL Injection in ImpressCMS 1.4.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject into the code in unintended way, this allows an attacker to read and modify the sensitive information from the database used by the application. If misconfigured, an attacker can …

  • High 7.4
    CVE-2022-24707 Public exploit

    SQL injection in anuko timetracker

    Anuko Time Tracker is an open source, web-based time tracking application written in PHP. UNION SQL injection and time-based blind injection vulnerabilities existed in Time Tracker Puncher plugin in versions of anuko timetracker prior to 1.20.0.5642. This was…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2022-24124 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 55%

    SQL Injection in Casdoor

    The query API in Casdoor before 1.13.1 has a SQL injection vulnerability related to the field and value parameters, as demonstrated by api/get-organizations.

  • High 8.0
    CVE-2022-21661 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 98%

    SQL injection in WordPress

    WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MariaDB database. Due to improper sanitization in WP_Query, there can be cases where SQL injection is possible through plugins or themes that use it in a certain wa…

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2021-24786 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 17%

    Download Monitor < 4.4.5 - Admin+ SQL Injection

    The Download Monitor WordPress plugin before 4.4.5 does not properly validate and escape the "orderby" GET parameter before using it in a SQL statement when viewing the logs, leading to an SQL Injection issue

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2021-43789 Public exploit

    Blind SQLi using Search filters in PrestaShop

    PrestaShop is an Open Source e-commerce web application. Versions of PrestaShop prior to 1.7.8.2 are vulnerable to blind SQL injection using search filters with `orderBy` and `sortOrder` parameters. The problem is fixed in version 1.7.8.2.

  • High 8.1
    CVE-2021-39165 Public exploit Scanner template

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    Cachet is an open source status page. With Cachet prior to and including 2.3.18, there is a SQL injection which is in the `SearchableTrait#scopeSearch()`. Attackers without authentication can utilize this vulnerability to exfiltrate sensitive data from the da…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2021-32789 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 17%

    Arbitrary SQL (SQL injection) possible via the Store API component.

    woocommerce-gutenberg-products-block is a feature plugin for WooCommerce Gutenberg Blocks. An SQL injection vulnerability impacts all WooCommerce sites running the WooCommerce Blocks feature plugin between version 2.5.0 and prior to version 2.5.16. Via a care…

  • High 7.7
    CVE-2021-21380 Public exploit

    Rating Script Service expose XWiki to SQL injection

    XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. In affected versions of XWiki Platform (and only those with the Ratings API installed), the Rating Script Service expose an API to perform SQL requests wi…

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2021-1636 Public exploit

    Microsoft SQL Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Microsoft SQL Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2020-5504 Public exploit EPSS 28%

    phpMyAdmin SQL injection in user accounts page

    In phpMyAdmin 4 before 4.9.4 and 5 before 5.0.1, SQL injection exists in the user accounts page. A malicious user could inject custom SQL in place of their own username when creating queries to this page. An attacker must have a valid MySQL account to access …

  • High 7.2
    CVE-2019-15984 Public exploit EPSS 47%

    Cisco Data Center Network Manager SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

    Multiple vulnerabilities in the REST and SOAP API endpoints of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands on an affected device. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would …

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2016-0710 Public exploit EPSS 52%

    Apache Jetspeed vulnerable to SQL Injection

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the User Manager service in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) role or (2) user parameter to services/usermanager/users/.

  • High 7.3
    CVE-2014-8682 Public exploit Scanner template EPSS 33%

    SQL Injection in Gogs

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Gogs (aka Go Git Service) 0.3.1-9 through 0.5.x before 0.5.6.1105 Beta allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the q parameter to (1) api/v1/repos/search, which is not properly handled in models/r…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2014-0763 Public exploit EPSS 16%

    Advantech WebAccess SQL Injection

    An attacker using SQL injection may use arguments to construct queries without proper sanitization. The DBVisitor.dll is exposed through SOAP interfaces, and the exposed functions are vulnerable to SOAP injection. This may allow unexpected SQL action and acce…

  • High 7.8
    CVE-2012-5861 Public exploit

    Sinapsi eSolar SQL Injection

    These Sinapsi devices do not check the validity of the data before executing queries. By accessing the SQL table of certain pages that do not require authentication within the device, attackers can leak information from the device. This could allow the attack…