Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

Base

The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

    For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.

  2. Architecture and Design

    If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.

    Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedures. These features should accept parameters or variables and support strong typing. Do not dynamically construct and execute query strings within these features using "exec" or similar functionality, since this may re-introduce the possibility of SQL injection. [REF-867]

  3. Architecture and Design, Operation

    Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

    Specifically, follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. The database users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account. If the requirements of the system indicate that a user can read and modify their own data, then limit their privileges so they cannot read/write others' data. Use the strictest permissions possible on all database objects, such as execute-only for stored procedures.

  4. Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

  5. Implementation

    While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).

    Instead of building a new implementation, such features may be available in the database or programming language. For example, the Oracle DBMS_ASSERT package can check or enforce that parameters have certain properties that make them less vulnerable to SQL injection. For MySQL, the mysql_real_escape_string() API function is available in both C and PHP.

  6. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

    When constructing SQL query strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.

    Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing SQL injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent SQL injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, the name "O'Reilly" would likely pass the validation step, since it is a common last name in the English language. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the database because it contains the "'" apostrophe character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the apostrophe might reduce the risk of SQL injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the wrong name would be recorded.

    When feasible, it may be safest to disallow meta-characters entirely, instead of escaping them. This will provide some defense in depth. After the data is entered into the database, later processes may neglect to escape meta-characters before use, and you may not have control over those processes.

  7. Architecture and Design

    When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.

  8. Implementation

    Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.

    If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.

    Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

    In the context of SQL Injection, error messages revealing the structure of a SQL query can help attackers tailor successful attack strings.

Source: MITRE CWE-89

4,517 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • Medium 6.8

    Database for Contact Form 7, WPforms, Elementor forms < 1.5.5 - Authenticated SQL Injection via id Parameter

    The Database for Contact Form 7, WPforms, Elementor forms WordPress plugin before 1.5.5 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, leading to a SQL Injection exploitable by users granted a specific capability which i…

  • Medium 6.3

    cemtan sar2html Search sar2html.py sql injection

    A vulnerability was detected in cemtan sar2html 4.0.0. This affects an unknown part of the file sar2html.py of the component Search. Performing a manipulation of the argument Search results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The…

  • Medium 6.5

    Shlink Blind SQL Injection via tags/stats orderBy Parameter

    Shlink contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability that allows any authenticated API key holder to inject arbitrary SQL fragments by supplying an unvalidated direction value in the orderBy query parameter of the tag statistics endpoint. Attackers can craft a…

  • Medium 4.7

    osCommerce Email Template Configuration EmailController.php EmailController sql injection

    A security flaw has been discovered in osCommerce 4.14.63493. Affected by this issue is the function EmailController of the file app/lib/backend/controllers/EmailController.php of the component Email Template Configuration. Performing a manipulation of the ar…

  • Medium 6.5

    CubeWP Framework <= 1.1.30 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'relation_id' Parameter

    The CubeWP Framework plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in all versions up to and including 1.1.30. This is due to insufficient input sanitization in the cubewp_remove_relation() AJAX function, specifically the use of wp_unslash() on the rela…

  • Medium 4.9

    WPvivid <= 0.9.131 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'export_data' Parameter

    The WPvivid Backup & Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the export_data parameter in versions up to, and including, 0.9.131. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation …

  • Medium 4.9

    Icegram Mailer <= 1.0.12 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'fields' Parameter

    The Icegram Mailer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'fields' parameter in versions up to, and including, 1.0.12. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing …

  • Medium 4.9

    GSheetConnector <= 5.2.1 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 's' Parameter

    The GSheetConnector – CF7 Google Sheets Connector with Real-Time Sync plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 's' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and…

  • Medium 5.3

    Database Collation Fix <= 1.2.10 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via 'force-collation-algorithm' Parameter

    The Database Collation Fix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'force-collation-algorithm' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.10 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of suffic…

  • Medium 6.5

    Icegram Engage <= 3.1.42 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Second-Order SQL Injection via 'messages[][id]' Parameter

    The Icegram Engage – Popups, Optins, CTAs & Lead Generation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to second-order SQL Injection via 'messages[][id]' Parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.42 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied paramete…

  • Medium 4.9

    Pinpoint Booking System <= 2.9.9.6.9 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'field' Parameter

    The Pinpoint Booking System – Version 2 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind SQL Injection via the 'field' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.9.6.9 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient prep…

  • Medium 5.5

    Decidim: Admin user search allows SQL injection through similarity-based sorting

    Decidim is a participatory democracy framework. Prior to 0.30.9, from 0.31.0 before 0.31.5, and in 0.32.0.rc1 before 0.32.0.rc2, the GET /admin/organization/users search interpolates params[:term] into raw Arel.sql ORDER BY similarity expressions before sanit…

  • Medium 4.3

    @dynatrace-oss/dynatrace-mcp-server has a DQL injection via parameters not documented as DQL

    ### Summary A DQL injection vulnerability in several read tools lets a caller bypass the tools' documented field-scope, time-window, and display caps by injecting DQL pipeline stages through parameters typed as identifiers. ### Details Several tools interpola…

  • Medium 6.5
    CVE-2026-14554 Scanner template

    Check & Log Email < 2.0.15 - Admin+ SQL Injection via d and s Parameters

    The Check & Log Email WordPress plugin before 2.0.15 does not properly sanitize and escape parameters before using them in SQL queries, allowing users with administrator privileges to perform SQL injection attacks.

  • Medium 4.7

    Kamaji: SQL injection via unescaped datastore identifiers in PostgreSQL/MySQL drivers

    Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. Prior to 26.7.4-edge, the PostgreSQL and MySQL datastore drivers build DDL statements by interpolating the user-supplied DataStoreUsername/DataStoreSchema directly into SQL via fmt.Sprintf, without es…

  • Medium 6.8

    WP Hotel Booking < 2.3.2 - Hotel Manager+ SQL Injection via Booking List Search

    The WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.2 does not sanitise and escape a search parameter on an administrative listing before using it in a SQL query, allowing users holding the WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.2's booking-management role…

  • Medium 6.5

    Improved Save Button <= 1.2.1 - Authenticated (Author+) Second-Order SQL Injection via 'meta_key' Parameter

    The Improved Save Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to second-order SQL Injection via 'meta_key' Custom Field via 'Save and Duplicate' Action in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and l…

  • Medium 5.1

    Blind SQL Injection in Quick.CMS

    A Blind SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in Quick.CMS. Improper neutralization of input provided by a high-privileged user into multiple fields in administration panel allows for Blind SQL Injection attacks. The vendor states that this administ…

  • Medium 4.9

    WP-Lister Lite for eBay <= 3.8.8 - Authenticated (Shop Manager+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The WP-Lister Lite for eBay plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.8 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on t…

  • Medium 4.9

    WP Photo Album Plus <= 9.2.04.002 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'table' Parameter

    The WP Photo Album Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'table' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 9.2.04.002 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on th…

  • Medium 6.3

    Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Patch.

    Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Patch.

  • Medium 6.5

    Plugin Organizer <= 10.2.4 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection

    The Plugin Organizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'PO_plugin_path' parameter in versions up to, and including, 10.2.4. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied parameter in the perform_plugin_search() function, …

  • Medium 4.9

    Tutor LMS <= 4.0.1 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'coupon_code' Parameter

    The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'coupon_code' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack o…

  • Medium 6.5

    Taskbuilder <= 5.0.9 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection

    The Taskbuilder – Project Management & Task Management Tool With Kanban Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'wppm_proj_filter' parameter in versions up to, and including, 5.0.9. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-su…

  • Medium 4.4

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'checkout_payment_plans' and 'order_status' Settings

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via 'checkout_payment_plans' and 'order_status' Settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to in…

  • Medium 4.9

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to insufficient escaping on the…

  • Medium 4.9

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'id' Parameter

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'id' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to insufficient escaping on the user su…

  • Medium 4.9

    ShopLentor <= 3.4.5 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The ShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.5 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied …

  • Medium 6.5

    Chaty Pro <= 3.5.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'widget_id' Parameter

    The Chaty Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authenticated Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in versions up to and including 3.5.5. This is due to the fetch_custom_field() function in admin/class-admin-base.php retrieving the widget_id POST parameter via …

  • Medium 6.5

    Likeshop 3.0.5 Authenticated SQL Injection via adjustAccount Endpoint

    Likeshop through 3.0.5 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows admin-level users to extract arbitrary database contents by submitting unsanitized POST parameters to the adjustAccount endpoint. The adjustAccount method in UserLogic.ph…

  • Medium 4.9

    Ninja Forms <= 3.14.9 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via Import File 'settings' Key

    The Ninja Forms – The Contact Form Builder That Grows With You plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via Import File 'settings' Key in all versions up to, and including, 3.14.9 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter …

  • Medium 6.5

    Tickera <= 3.6.0.1 - Authenticated (Staff+) SQL Injection via 'tc_order_status_filter' Parameter

    The Tickera – Sell Tickets & Manage Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'tc_order_status_filter' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lac…

  • Medium 6.5

    Registrations for the Events Calendar <= 3.2 - Authenticated (Contributor+) SQL Injection via 'standard' Parameter

    The Registrations For The Events Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via JSON keys in the 'standard' parameter handled by the rtec_records_edit AJAX action in versions up to and including 3.2. The handler decodes attacker-controlled J…

  • Medium 6.5

    AI Copilot <= 1.5.4 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'order[0][dir]' Parameter

    The AI Copilot – Content Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via 'order[0][dir]' Parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.4 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient prepara…

  • Medium 6.5

    Premium Packages <= 7.0.4 - Authenticated (Admin+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The Premium Packages – Sell Digital Products Securely plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.0.4 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of s…

  • Medium 6.5

    Tickera <= 3.6.0.1 - Authenticated (Staff+) SQL Injection via 'tc_event_filter' Parameter

    The Tickera – Sell Tickets & Manage Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'tc_event_filter' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of su…

  • Medium 6.3

    itsourcecode Hospital Management System prescription.php sql injection

    A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /prescription.php. The manipulation of the argument editid results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The explo…

  • Medium 6.3

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Learning Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Import And Export). Supp…

  • Medium 6.3

    Vulnerability in the Oracle HCM Configuration Workbench product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Install). Suppor…

  • Medium 6.3

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Common Applications Calendar product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Calendar Synchr…