Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

Base

The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

    For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.

  2. Architecture and Design

    If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.

    Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedures. These features should accept parameters or variables and support strong typing. Do not dynamically construct and execute query strings within these features using "exec" or similar functionality, since this may re-introduce the possibility of SQL injection. [REF-867]

  3. Architecture and Design, Operation

    Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

    Specifically, follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. The database users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account. If the requirements of the system indicate that a user can read and modify their own data, then limit their privileges so they cannot read/write others' data. Use the strictest permissions possible on all database objects, such as execute-only for stored procedures.

  4. Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

  5. Implementation

    While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).

    Instead of building a new implementation, such features may be available in the database or programming language. For example, the Oracle DBMS_ASSERT package can check or enforce that parameters have certain properties that make them less vulnerable to SQL injection. For MySQL, the mysql_real_escape_string() API function is available in both C and PHP.

  6. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

    When constructing SQL query strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.

    Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing SQL injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent SQL injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, the name "O'Reilly" would likely pass the validation step, since it is a common last name in the English language. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the database because it contains the "'" apostrophe character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the apostrophe might reduce the risk of SQL injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the wrong name would be recorded.

    When feasible, it may be safest to disallow meta-characters entirely, instead of escaping them. This will provide some defense in depth. After the data is entered into the database, later processes may neglect to escape meta-characters before use, and you may not have control over those processes.

  7. Architecture and Design

    When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.

  8. Implementation

    Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.

    If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.

    Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

    In the context of SQL Injection, error messages revealing the structure of a SQL query can help attackers tailor successful attack strings.

Source: MITRE CWE-89

13,971 results · Feed

  • Critical 9.4

    Authenticated SQL Injection Enables Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information in Ellucian Advance Web and Legacy Advance

    A SQL Injection in the Giving Reports functionality in Ellucian Advance Web and Legacy Advance allows an authenticated attacker to extract sensitive information from databases via a crafted SQL query in the class credit field. This issue affects Advance Web: …

  • Medium 6.3

    Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Patch.

    Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Patch.

  • Medium 6.5

    Plugin Organizer <= 10.2.4 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection

    The Plugin Organizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'PO_plugin_path' parameter in versions up to, and including, 10.2.4. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied parameter in the perform_plugin_search() function, …

  • High 8.1

    SQL injection Security Vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway

    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A…

  • Critical 9.0

    The pglogical queue mechanism, used to convey out-of-band commands such as replicated DDL from a publisher to a subscri…

  • Medium 4.9

    Tutor LMS <= 4.0.1 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'coupon_code' Parameter

    The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'coupon_code' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack o…

  • High 7.5

    Web Directory Free <= 1.7.13 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    The Web Directory Free plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'levels' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.13 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the ex…

  • High 7.5

    PickPlugins Question Answer <= 1.2.73 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via 'id' Parameter

    The PickPlugins Question Answer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in versions up to and including 1.2.73. This is due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input via the 'id' GET parameter in the user profile template combined with t…

  • Critical 9.8

    SQL injection via unauthenticated GetGridData endpoint

    In PROCON-WEB SCADA the endpoint 'GetGridData' is not properly sanitized. This allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands.

  • High 7.5

    TrueBooker <= 1.2.2 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'alldata[truebooker_user]' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied pa…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2026-12800 Scanner template

    Premium Packages <= 6.2.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    The Premium Packages – Sell Digital Products Securely plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'code' parameter of the POST /wp-json/wpdmpp/v1/cart/coupon REST API endpoint in versions up to, and including, 6.2.0. This is due to insufficien…

  • Medium 6.5

    Taskbuilder <= 5.0.9 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection

    The Taskbuilder – Project Management & Task Management Tool With Kanban Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'wppm_proj_filter' parameter in versions up to, and including, 5.0.9. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-su…

  • High 7.5

    Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System <= 27.5 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    The Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System – Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'staff_ids' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 27.5 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter a…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2026-12741 Scanner template

    WP Fast Total Search <= 1.80.280 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

    The WP Fast Total Search – The Power of Indexed Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'form_data[s]' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.80.280 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and …

  • Medium 4.4

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'checkout_payment_plans' and 'order_status' Settings

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via 'checkout_payment_plans' and 'order_status' Settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to in…

  • Medium 4.9

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to insufficient escaping on the…

  • Medium 4.9

    SMS Alert <= 3.9.7 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'id' Parameter

    The SMS Alert – SMS & OTP for WooCommerce, Order Notifications & Abandoned Cart Recovery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'id' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7 due to insufficient escaping on the user su…

  • Medium 4.9

    ShopLentor <= 3.4.5 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via 'orderby' Parameter

    The ShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.5 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied …

  • Medium 6.5

    Chaty Pro <= 3.5.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'widget_id' Parameter

    The Chaty Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authenticated Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in versions up to and including 3.5.5. This is due to the fetch_custom_field() function in admin/class-admin-base.php retrieving the widget_id POST parameter via …

  • Critical 9.1

    VeloCloud Orchestrator Flow Metrics API SQL Injection

    An input validation vulnerability exists in an API component of the orchestrator. An authenticated user can exploit this flaw to manipulate backend queries, which may result in unauthorized access to data beyond their intended privileges and cause the underly…

  • High 7.6

    WordPress WP Google Review Slider plugin <= 18.4 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Administrator SQL Injection in WP Google Review Slider <= 18.4 versions.

  • High 8.5

    WordPress rtMedia for WordPress, BuddyPress and bbPress plugin <= 4.7.10 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Subscriber SQL Injection in rtMedia for WordPress, BuddyPress and bbPress <= 4.7.10 versions.

  • Critical 9.3
    CVE-2026-59550 Public exploit

    WordPress AWP Classifieds plugin <= 4.4.7 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection in AWP Classifieds <= 4.4.7 versions.

  • Critical 9.3

    WordPress rtMedia for WordPress, BuddyPress and bbPress plugin <= 4.7.10 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection in rtMedia for WordPress, BuddyPress and bbPress <= 4.7.10 versions.

  • Critical 9.3

    WordPress GamiPress plugin <= 7.9.7 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection in GamiPress <= 7.9.7 versions.

  • High 7.6

    WordPress Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce plugin <= 2.10.22 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Administrator SQL Injection in Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce <= 2.10.22 versions.

  • Critical 9.3

    WordPress Relevanssi Light plugin <= 1.2.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Relevanssi Light <= 1.2.2 versions.

  • Critical 9.3

    WordPress MapSVG plugin <= 8.14.0 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Unauthenticated SQL Injection in MapSVG <= 8.14.0 versions.

  • Critical 9.2

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.8.0

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.8.0 - Improper validation of catid parameters in the loadMoreArticles endpoint leads to an SQL injection vector.

  • High 8.2

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Authenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.7.1

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Authenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.7.1 - Improper validation of various parameters in the media manager search and date filters lead to an SQL injection vector.

  • Critical 9.2

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.7.1

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in SP Page Builder < 6.7.1 - Improper validation of order parameters in the Dynamic Content endpoint leads to an SQL injection vector.

  • Low 3.8

    WPBot AI ChatBot < 8.5.2 - Admin+ Second-Order SQL Injection via qc_bot_str_fields

    The WPBot WordPress plugin before 8.5.2 does not validate administrator-configured field identifiers before using them in a SQL query, allowing users with administrator access to perform SQL injection that executes when a visitor triggers a search.

  • Critical 9.1
    CVE-2025-50455 Public exploit

    SQL injection vulnerability exists in the order_by parameter of the /customers/search endpoint in Alex Tselegidis EasyA…

  • High 7.5

    SQL injection vulnerability in Dede CMS v.5.7.118 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the sqlq…

  • Medium 6.5

    Likeshop 3.0.5 Authenticated SQL Injection via adjustAccount Endpoint

    Likeshop through 3.0.5 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows admin-level users to extract arbitrary database contents by submitting unsanitized POST parameters to the adjustAccount endpoint. The adjustAccount method in UserLogic.ph…

  • Medium 4.9

    Ninja Forms <= 3.14.9 - Authenticated (Administrator+) SQL Injection via Import File 'settings' Key

    The Ninja Forms – The Contact Form Builder That Grows With You plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via Import File 'settings' Key in all versions up to, and including, 3.14.9 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter …

  • High 7.3

    CodeAstro Online Classroom loginlinkadmin.php sql injection

    A vulnerability was determined in CodeAstro Online Classroom 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /OnlineClassroom/loginlinkadmin.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument aid can lead to sql injection. The attack can be e…

  • Critical 9.8

    Appriss Insights VINE SQLI

    The Appriss Insights (Equifax) Victim Information Notification Exchange (VINE) applications allow an unauthenticated attacker to send a specially-crafted request to bypass the login page, access other users' credentials, take over other user accounts, access …

  • Critical 9.3
    CVE-2026-65761 Public exploit Scanner template

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-2.0.1

    Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-2.0.1 - Improper validation of order parameters lead to an unauthenticated SQL injection in easystore, allowing full DB read access including credentials and sessi…

  • High 7.6

    WordPress Persian Woocommerce SMS plugin <= 7.2.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability

    Shop manager SQL Injection in Persian Woocommerce SMS <= 7.2.2 versions.