Weakness (CWE)
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
How to prevent it (3 mitigations)
-
Implementation, Operation
If there is a known list of applications, IP, hostname, and/or domains to which the product is allowed to communicate, then use allowlists to ensure that outgoing requests are restricted to these known entities. The allowlists could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation, Operation
If the product is expected to be able to connect to arbitrary IP addresses or domains, consider using a denylist that includes private network addresses, internal domain names, etc. The denylist could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
When constructing outgoing requests from input strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
Source: MITRE CWE-918
341 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Critical 9.8
Unauthenticated server side request forgery in HPE Serviceguard Manager
-
Critical 9.8
An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
-
Critical 9.8
aEnrich a+HRD - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command o…
-
Critical 9.8
Wildix WMS 6 before 6.02.20221216, WMS 5 before 5.04.20221214, and WMS4 before 4.04.45396.23 allows Server-side request…
-
Critical 9.8CVE-2022-46364 Public exploit
Apache CXF SSRF Vulnerability
A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type.
-
Critical 9.8
Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests bet…
-
Critical 9.1
Moodle blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LTI provider library
A blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in Moodle. This flaw exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in LTI provider library. The library does not utilise Moodle's inbuilt cURL helper, which resulted in a blind …
-
Critical 9.1
ndk design NdkAdvancedCustomizationFields 3.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via rotateimg.php.
-
Critical 9.8
Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyz…
-
Critical 9.8
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in PHP Point of Sale version 19.0, by PHP Point of Sale, LLC.
The application was vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, allowing the backend server to interact with unexpected endpoints, potentially including internal and local services, leading to attacks in other downstream systems.
-
Critical 9.6
Web Stories <= 1.24.0 - Server Side Request Forgery
The Web Stories plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.24.0 due to insufficient validation of URLs supplied via the 'url' parameter found via the /v1/hotlink/proxy REST API Endpoint. This makes it …
-
Critical 9.8
Skipper vulnerable to SSRF via X-Skipper-Proxy
Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
-
Critical 9.8CVE-2022-42149 Scanner template
kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java.
-
Critical 9.1
A security issue was discovered in WeBid <=1.2.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the admin/theme…
-
Critical 9.8
iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php.
-
Critical 9.8
ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/i…
-
Critical 9.8
ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /mana…
-
Critical 9.8
A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_use…
-
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ionicabizau/parse-url
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 8.1.0.
-
Critical 9.8CVE-2022-36663 Public exploit
Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter
Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.
-
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nocodb/nocodb
With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information.
-
Critical 9.8
Apache Portals Jetspeed XSS, CSRF, SSRF, and XXE issues
Apache Jetspeed-2 does not sufficiently filter untrusted user input by default leading to a number of issues including XSS, CSRF, XXE, and SSRF. Setting the configuration option "xss.filter.post = true" may mitigate these issues. NOTE: Apache Jetspeed is a do…
-
Critical 9.4
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ionicabizau/parse-url
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 7.0.0.
-
Critical 9.1
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information in nocodb/nocodb
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information in GitHub repository nocodb/nocodb prior to 0.91.7+.
-
Critical 9.1CVE-2022-31830 EPSS 16%
Server-Side Request Forgery in kityminder
Kity Minder v1.3.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the init function at ImageCapture.class.php.
-
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery in FlyteConsole
FlyteConsole is the web user interface for the Flyte platform. FlyteConsole prior to version 0.52.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when FlyteConsole is open to the general internet. An attacker can exploit any user of a vulnerable instanc…
-
Critical 9.4CVE-2022-1592 Public exploit
Server-Side Request Forgery in scout in clinical-genomics/scout
Server-Side Request Forgery in scout in GitHub repository clinical-genomics/scout prior to v4.42. An attacker could make the application perform arbitrary requests to fishing steal cookie, request to private area, or lead to xss...
-
Critical 9.8
Server side request forgery in gibbon
Gibbon v3.4.4 and below allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a crafted URL.
-
Critical 9.3
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in janeczku/calibre-web
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18.
-
Critical 9.0
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in janeczku/calibre-web
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18.
-
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in janeczku/calibre-web
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.17.
-
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery and Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in LemMinX
A flaw was found in vscode-xml in versions prior to 0.19.0. Schema download could lead to blind SSRF or DoS via a large file.
-
Critical 10.0
Airspan Networks Mimosa Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
This vulnerability could allow an attacker to force the server to create and execute a web request granting access to backend APIs that are only accessible to the Mimosa MMP server, or request pages that could perform some actions themselves. The attacker cou…
-
Critical 9.0
mod_proxy SSRF
A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
KEV Dec 1, 2021 -
Critical 9.1
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.1
There is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Esri ArcGIS Server Manager version 10.8.1 and below.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ArcGIS Server Manager version 10.8.1 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitati…
-
Critical 9.8
Multiple vulnerabilities leading to RCE
elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Several vulnerabilities affect elFinder 2.1.58. These vulnerabilities can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code and commands on the server hosting the elFinder PHP c…
-
Critical 9.8
The vSphere Client (HTML5) contains a remote code execution vulnerability due to lack of input validation in the Virtua…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.1
Server-Side Request Forgery in Feehi CMS
Feehi CMS 2.1.1 is affected by a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. When the user modifies the HTTP Referer header to any url, the server can make a request to it.
-
Critical —
Lack of Input Validation in zendesk_api_client_php for Zendesk Subdomain
### Impact Lack of input validation of the Zendesk subdomain could expose users of the library to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). ### Resolution Validate the provided Zendesk subdomain to be a valid subdomain in: * getAuthUrl * getAccessToken