Weakness (CWE)
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
How to prevent it (3 mitigations)
-
Implementation, Operation
If there is a known list of applications, IP, hostname, and/or domains to which the product is allowed to communicate, then use allowlists to ensure that outgoing requests are restricted to these known entities. The allowlists could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation, Operation
If the product is expected to be able to connect to arbitrary IP addresses or domains, consider using a denylist that includes private network addresses, internal domain names, etc. The denylist could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
When constructing outgoing requests from input strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
Source: MITRE CWE-918
1,873 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Medium 6.9
Portkey.ai Gateway: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Custom Host
Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specifie…
-
Medium 6.8
Frontend arbitrary file read in oauth.authorize action
An authenticated Zabbix Super Admin can exploit the oauth.authorize action to read arbitrary files from the webserver leading to potential confidentiality loss.
-
Medium 6.3
orionsec orion-ops SSH Connection MachineInfoController.java server-side request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in orionsec orion-ops up to 5925824997a3109651bbde07460958a7be249ed1. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file orion-ops-api/orion-ops-web/src/main/java/cn/orionsec/ops/controller/MachineInfoController.ja…
-
Medium 6.3CVE-2025-13796 Public exploit
deco-cx apps Parameter analyticsScript.ts AnalyticsScript server-side request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in deco-cx apps up to 0.120.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function AnalyticsScript of the file website/loaders/analyticsScript.ts of the component Parameter Handler. Such manipulation of the argument url l…
-
Medium 6.3
ZenTao model.php makeRequest server-side request forgery
A vulnerability was found in ZenTao up to 21.7.6-8564. This affects the function makeRequest of the file module/ai/model.php. The manipulation of the argument Base results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has be…
-
Medium 6.5
AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS <= 2.7.0 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via 'pinecone_url' Parameter
The AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0 via the ays_chatgpt_pinecone_upsert function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated att…
-
Medium 6.3
lKinderBueno Streamity Xtream IPTV Player proxy.php server-side request forgery
A vulnerability was found in lKinderBueno Streamity Xtream IPTV Player up to 2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file public/proxy.php. Performing manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. T…
-
Medium 6.4
WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate <= 7.4.5 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.4.5 via the su_shortcode_csv_table function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Admi…
-
Medium 5.3
External Service Interaction (DNS)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Transfer.This issue affects MOVEit Transfer: before 2024.1.8, from 2025.0.0 before 2025.0.4.
-
Medium 5.4
Responsive Lightbox & Gallery <= 2.5.3 - Authenticated (Author+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.3 via the 'get_image_size_by_url' function. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs when determi…
-
Medium 6.4
Icon List Block – Add Icon-Based Lists with Custom Styles <= 1.2.1 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The Icon List Block – Add Icon-Based Lists with Custom Styles plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1 via the fs_api_request function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, wi…
-
Medium 6.8
AI Engine <= 3.1.8 - Authenticated (Editor+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.8 via the rest_helpers_create_images function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Editor-level access and above, to…
-
Medium 5.8
WP Migrate Lite <= 2.7.6 - Unauthenticated Blind Server-Side Request Forgery
The WP Migrate Lite – WordPress Migration Made Easy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.6 via the wpmdb_flush AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to ma…
-
Medium 6.4
Local Syndication <= 1.5a - Authenticated (Contributor+) Server-Side Request Forgery via Shortcode
The Local Syndication plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5a via the `url` parameter in the `[syndicate_local]` shortcode. This is due to the use of `wp_remote_get()` instead of `wp_safe_re…
-
Medium 5.1CVE-2025-63408 Public exploit
Local Agent DVR versions thru 6.6.1.0 are vulnerable to directory traversal that allows an unauthenticated local attack…
-
Medium 6.3
rachelos WeRSS we-mp-rss Webhook mps.py do_job server-side request forgery
A weakness has been identified in rachelos WeRSS we-mp-rss up to 1.4.7. Affected by this vulnerability is the function do_job of the file /rachelos/we-mp-rss/blob/main/jobs/mps.py of the component Webhook Module. Executing manipulation of the argument web_hoo…
-
Medium 6.8
grist-core has path to server-side requests via websocket
grist-core is a spreadsheet hosting server. Prior to version 1.7.7, a user with access to any document on a Grist installation can use a feature for fetching from a URL that is executed on the server. The privileged network access of server-side requests coul…
-
Medium 6.5CVE-2025-64525 Scanner template
Astro: URL manipulation via unsanitized headers leads to path-based middleware protections bypass, potential SSRF/cache-poisoning, CVE-2025-61925 bypass
Astro is a web framework. In Astro versions 2.16.0 up to but excluding 5.15.5 which utilizeon-demand rendering, request headers `x-forwarded-proto` and `x-forwarded-port` are insecurely used, without sanitization, to build the URL. This has several consequenc…
-
Medium 6.5
Lichess lila before commit 11b4c0fb00f0ffd823246f839627005459c8f05c (2025-06-02) contains a Server-Side Request Forgery…
-
Medium 5.3
ThinkDashboard: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in /api/ping Endpoint
ThinkDashboard is a self-hosted bookmark dashboard built with Go and vanilla JavaScript. Versions 0.6.7 and below contain a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, in its `/api/ping?url= endpoint`. This allows an attacker to make arbitrary req…
-
Medium 4.3
Blog2Social: Social Media Auto Post & Scheduler <= 8.6.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Blind Server-Side Request Forgery via post_url
The Blog2Social: Social Media Auto Post & Scheduler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.6.0 via the getFullContent() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subsc…
-
Medium 6.4
B Carousel Block – Responsive Image and Content Carousel <= 1.1.5 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The B Carousel Block – Responsive Image and Content Carousel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to the plugin not validating user-supplied URLs before passing them to the wp_r…
-
Medium 6.4
WPeMatico RSS Feed Fetcher <= 2.8.11 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Server-Side Request Forgery via wpematico_test_feed
The WPeMatico RSS Feed Fetcher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.11 via the wpematico_test_feed() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level acc…
-
Medium 6.9
Nagios XI < 5.6.11 Unauthenticated XSS and SSRF via Highcharts
Nagios XI versions prior to 5.6.11 contain unauthenticated vulnerabilities in the Highcharts local exporting tool. Crafted export requests could (1) inject script into exported/returned content due to insufficient output encoding (XSS), and (2) cause the serv…
-
Medium 6.5
PerfreeBlog v4.0.11 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to a missing authorization check in the uploadAtta…
-
Medium 5.9
Vulnerability in Keras Model.load_model Leading to Arbitrary Local File Loading and SSRF
The Keras.Model.load_model method, including when executed with the intended security mitigation safe_mode=True, is vulnerable to arbitrary local file loading and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability stems from the way the StringLookup layer…
-
Medium 5.8
An unauthenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Thumbnail via-uri endpoint of Halo CMS 2.21 …
-
Medium 5.4
Multiple Vulnerabilities in IBM Concert Software.
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.0.0 Software is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
-
Medium 4.9
WordPress Slider Templates plugin <= 1.0.3 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Codeless Slider Templates slider-templates allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Slider Templates: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.
-
Medium 5.9CVE-2025-5350 Scanner template
SSRF and Reflected XSS Vulnerability in Deprecated Try-It Feature of Multiple WSO2 Products
SSRF and Reflected XSS Vulnerabilities exist in multiple WSO2 products within the deprecated Try-It feature, which was accessible only to administrative users. This feature accepted user-supplied URLs without proper validation, leading to server-side request …
-
Medium 6.8
Real Cookie Banner: GDPR & ePrivacy Cookie Consent <= 5.2.4 - Authenticated (Admin+) Server-Side Request Forgery via scan-without-login Endpoint
The Real Cookie Banner: GDPR & ePrivacy Cookie Consent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.4. This is due to insufficient validation on the user-supplied URL in the '/scanner/scan-without…
-
Medium 5.5CVE-2025-10874 Public exploit
Orbit Fox < 3.0.2 - Author+ Server-Side Request Forgery
The Orbit Fox: Duplicate Page, Menu Icons, SVG Support, Cookie Notice, Custom Fonts & More WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a ser…
-
Medium 5.0
Feedzy RSS Feeds Lite <= 5.1.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The RSS Aggregator by Feedzy – Feed to Post, Autoblogging, News & YouTube Video Feeds Aggregator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.0 via the 'feedzy_sanitize_feeds' function. This makes…
-
Medium 5.3
MxChat – AI Chatbot for WordPress <= 2.4.6 - Unauthenticated Blind Server-Side Request Forgery
The MxChat – AI Chatbot for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs in the PDF processing functionality. This m…
-
Medium 6.9
FastGPT File Reading Node SSRF Vulnerability
FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Prior to version 4.11.1, in the workflow file reading node, the network link is not security-verified, posing a risk of SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 4.11.1.
-
Medium 4.4
WordPress Icegram Express Pro plugin <= 5.9.5 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Captcha.eu plugin <= 1.0.61 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in captcha.eu Captcha.eu captcha-eu allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Captcha.eu: from n/a through <= 1.0.61.
-
Medium 5.0
Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.12 allows SSRF because of the configuration of the chat proxy.
-
Medium 5.0
Element Pack Addons for Elementor <= 8.2.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Blind Server-Side Request Forgery
The Element Pack Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.2.5 via the wp_ajax_import_elementor_template action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, wit…
-
Medium 6.4
Essential Blocks <= 5.7.1 - Authenticated (Author+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The Gutenberg Essential Blocks – Page Builder for Gutenberg Blocks & Patterns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.1 via the eb_save_ai_generated_image function. This makes it possible for…