Weakness (CWE)
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
How to prevent it (3 mitigations)
-
Implementation, Operation
If there is a known list of applications, IP, hostname, and/or domains to which the product is allowed to communicate, then use allowlists to ensure that outgoing requests are restricted to these known entities. The allowlists could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation, Operation
If the product is expected to be able to connect to arbitrary IP addresses or domains, consider using a denylist that includes private network addresses, internal domain names, etc. The denylist could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
When constructing outgoing requests from input strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
Source: MITRE CWE-918
3,822 results · Feed
-
Critical 9.8
GroupMe Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
An improper access control vulnerability in GroupMe allows an a unauthenticated attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
-
High 8.2
czim/file-handling vulnerable to SSRF and directory traversal
The czim/file-handling package before 1.5.0 and 2.x before 2.3.0 (used with PHP Composer) does not properly validate URLs within makeFromUrl and makeFromAny, leading to SSRF, and to directory traversal for the reading of local files.
-
High 7.5
SSRF in berriai/litellm
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in berriai/litellm version 1.38.10. This vulnerability allows users to specify the `api_base` parameter when making requests to `POST /chat/completions`, causing the application to send the request to …
-
High 7.7
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitLab
A server-side request forgery issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 16.8 prior to 17.1.7, from 17.2 prior to 17.2.5, and from 17.3 prior to 17.3.2. It was possible for an attacker to make requests to internal resources us…
-
Medium 5.3
Possible External service interaction Vulnerability
Possible External Service Interaction attack in eDirectory has been discovered in OpenText™ eDirectory. This impact all version before 9.2.6.0000.
-
High 8.8
Loftware Spectrum (testDeviceConnection) before 5.1 allows SSRF.
-
High 8.8
Loftware Spectrum before 5.1 allows SSRF.
-
Critical 9.8
SeaCMS v13.1 was discovered to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at /admin_reslib.php.
-
High 8.8
A server side request forgery vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to perform local privilege escalation through …
-
Critical 9.3CVE-2024-24759 Scanner template
MindsDB Vulnerable to Bypass of SSRF Protection with DNS Rebinding
MindsDB is a platform for building artificial intelligence from enterprise data. Prior to version 23.12.4.2, a threat actor can bypass the server-side request forgery protection on the whole website with DNS Rebinding. The vulnerability can also lead to denia…
-
High 8.8
Apache OFBiz: Prevent use of URLs in files when loading them from Java or Groovy, leading to a RCE
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.16, which fixes the issue.
-
Critical 9.8
req may send an unintended request when a malformed URL is provided
The req package before 3.43.4 for Go may send an unintended request when a malformed URL is provided, because cleanHost in http.go intentionally uses a "garbage in, garbage out" design.
-
Medium 4.5
Potential access to sensitive URLs via CKAN extensions (SSRF)
CKAN is an open-source data management system for powering data hubs and data portals. There are a number of CKAN plugins, including XLoader, DataPusher, Resource proxy and ckanext-archiver, that work by downloading the contents of local or remote files in or…
-
Low 3.4
TruffleHog has a Blind SSRF in some Detectors
TruffleHog is a secrets scanning tool. Prior to v3.81.9, this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to craft data in a way that, when scanned by specific detectors, could trigger the detector to make an unauthorized request to an endpoint chosen by the attac…
-
High 7.2
Skitter Slideshow <= 2.5.2 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery
The Skitter Slideshow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 via the /image.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations origi…
-
Medium 6.3
XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allow…
-
Medium 6.5
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Terminalfour before 8.3.19 allows authenticated users to use spec…
-
High 7.3
wanglongcn ltcms API Endpoint downloadUrl server-side request forgery
A vulnerability was found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function downloadUrl of the file /api/file/downloadUrl of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument file leads to …
-
High 7.3
wanglongcn ltcms API Endpoint multiDownload server-side request forgery
A vulnerability was found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function multiDownload of the file /api/file/multiDownload of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument file leads to server-side requ…
-
High 7.3
wanglongcn ltcms API Endpoint download server-side request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function download of the file /api/test/download of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side requ…
-
Critical 9.1
Azure Health Bot Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network.
-
Medium 5.0
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SAP CRM ABAP (Insights Management)
SAP CRM ABAP (Insights Management) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in information disclosure. It has no impact on integrity an…
-
Critical 10.0
CometVisu Backend for openHAB affected by SSRF/XSS
openHAB, a provider of open-source home automation software, has add-ons including the visualization add-on CometVisu. In versions 3.4.0.M4 through 4.2.0,, the proxy endpoint of openHAB's CometVisu add-on can be accessed without authentication. This proxy-fea…
-
Medium 4.0
Server-Side Request Forgery in axios
axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative URLs.
-
Critical 9.8CVE-2024-41570 Public exploit
An Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in demon callback handling in Havoc 2 0.7 allows attackers to sen…
-
High 8.5
Modern Events Calendar <= 7.12.1 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Server Side Request Forgery
The Modern Events Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.12.1 via the 'mec_fes_form' AJAX function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access an…
-
High 8.5CVE-2024-38206 EPSS 12%
Microsoft Copilot Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability
An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network.
-
High 8.6
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nuxt-icon
Nuxt is a free and open-source framework to create full-stack web applications and websites with Vue.js. `nuxt/icon` provides an API to allow client side icon lookup. This endpoint is at `/api/_nuxt_icon/[name]`. The proxied request path is improperly parsed,…
-
High 7.3
Apache IoTDB Workbench: SSRF Vulnerability (EOL)
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache IoTDB Workbench. This issue affects Apache IoTDB Workbench: from 0.13.0. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users ar…
-
High 8.6
Rocket.Chat Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) affects Rocket.Chat's Twilio webhook endpoint before version 6.10.1.
-
Medium 5.4
WordPress Edubin theme <= 9.2.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in pixelcurve Edubin edubin.This issue affects Edubin: from n/a through <= 9.2.0.
-
Medium 4.9
WordPress AI ENGINE plugin <= 2.4.7 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jordy Meow AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: ChatGPT Chatbot: from n/a through 2.4.7.
-
Medium 6.4
Remote Content Shortcode <= 1.5 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Server-Side Request Forgery
The Remote Content Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5 via the remote_content shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and ab…
-
Medium 6.3
YouDianCMS ydLib.php curl_exec server-side request forgery
A vulnerability has been found in YouDianCMS 7 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function curl_exec of the file /App/Core/Extend/Function/ydLib.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The…
-
High 7.5
streamlit-geospatial blind SSRF in pages/7_📦_Web_Map_Service.py
streamlit-geospatial is a streamlit multipage app for geospatial applications. Prior to commit c4f81d9616d40c60584e36abb15300853a66e489, the `url` variable on line 47 of `pages/7_📦_Web_Map_Service.py` takes user input, which is passed to `get_layers` function…
-
High 7.5
txtdot SSRF vulnerability in /proxy
txtdot is an HTTP proxy that parses only text, links, and pictures from pages, removing ads and heavy scripts. Starting in version 1.4.0 and prior to version 1.6.1, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `/proxy` route of txtdot allows remo…
-
High 7.5
txtdot SSRF vulnerability in /get
txtdot is an HTTP proxy that parses only text, links, and pictures from pages, removing ads and heavy scripts. Prior to version 1.7.0, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `/get` route of txtdot allows remote attackers to use the server a…
-
Medium 6.9
Server-Side Request Forgery in Automation 360
Automation Anywhere Automation 360 v21-v32 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in a web API component. An attacker with unauthenticated access to the Automation 360 Control Room HTTPS service (port 443) or HTTP service (port 80) can trigger arbitrary…
-
High 8.3
cBioPortal Proxy Endpoint Vulnerabliity
The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request …
-
Medium 5.4
Blind SSRF via Canarytoken Webhook
Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. I…