Weakness (CWE)
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
How to prevent it (3 mitigations)
-
Implementation, Operation
If there is a known list of applications, IP, hostname, and/or domains to which the product is allowed to communicate, then use allowlists to ensure that outgoing requests are restricted to these known entities. The allowlists could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation, Operation
If the product is expected to be able to connect to arbitrary IP addresses or domains, consider using a denylist that includes private network addresses, internal domain names, etc. The denylist could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation [REF-1511].
-
Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
When constructing outgoing requests from input strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
Source: MITRE CWE-918
3,822 results · Feed
-
Medium 5.8
WordPress PhonePe Payment Solutions Plugin <= 1.0.15 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PhonePe PhonePe Payment Solutions.This issue affects PhonePe Payment Solutions: from n/a through 1.0.15.
-
Medium 4.4
WordPress WPGraphQL Plugin <= 1.14.5 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL.This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 1.14.5.
-
High 7.1
WordPress Shortcodes Ultimate Plugin <= 5.12.6 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Vova Anokhin WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate.This issue affects WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate: from n/a through 5.12.6.
-
Medium 4.1
WordPress Motors – Car Dealer & Classified Ads Plugin <= 1.4.6 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in StylemixThemes Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing.This issue affects Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing: from n/a through 1.4.6.
-
Medium 6.4
WordPress PowerPress Podcasting Plugin <= 11.0.6 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry.This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry: from n/a through 11.0.6.
-
Medium 4.4
WordPress HTTP Headers Plugin <= 1.18.11 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Dimitar Ivanov HTTP Headers.This issue affects HTTP Headers: from n/a through 1.18.11.
-
Medium 5.5
WordPress Church Admin Plugin <= 3.7.56 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Andy Moyle Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 3.7.56.
-
Medium 4.4
WordPress Poll Maker Plugin <= 4.6.2 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2.
-
Medium 4.1
WordPress Download Monitor Plugin <= 4.8.1 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPChill Download Monitor.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through 4.8.1.
-
Low 3.4
Discourse SSRF vulnerability in Embedding
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Prior to version 3.1.3 of the `stable` branch and version 3.2.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, the embedding feature is susceptible to server side request forgery. The issue is p…
-
Critical 9.3
Sentry Next.js vulnerable to SSRF via Next.js SDK tunnel endpoint
sentry-javascript provides Sentry SDKs for JavaScript. An unsanitized input of Next.js SDK tunnel endpoint allows sending HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs and reflecting the response back to the user. This issue only affects users who have Next.js SDK tunnelin…
-
High 7.4
Server-Side Request Forgery in groupoffice
Group-Office is an enterprise CRM and groupware tool. In affected versions there is full Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /api/upload.php endpoint. The /api/upload.php endpoint does not filter URLs which allows a malicious user to cause…
-
Medium 5.1CVE-2022-3172 Public exploit
Kubernetes - API server - Aggregated API server can cause clients to be redirected (SSRF)
A security issue was discovered in kube-apiserver that allows an aggregated API server to redirect client traffic to any URL. This could lead to the client performing unexpected actions as well as forwarding the client's API server credentials to third partie…
-
Medium 4.3
QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated users to read application data via a network. We have already fixed the vulnerabil…
-
Medium 6.6
Server-Side Request Forgery in ManageEngine Desktop Central
A SSRF vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0, specifically the /smtpConfig.do component. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to launch targeted attacks, such as a cross-port attack, service e…
-
Medium 5.4
IBM Content Navigator server-side request forgery
IBM Content Navigator 3.0.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID:…
-
High 8.1
FoodCoopShop Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability
FoodCoopShop is open source software for food coops and local shops. Versions starting with 3.2.0 prior to 3.6.1 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery. In the Network module, a manufacturer account can use the `/api/updateProducts.json` endpoint to ma…
-
High 8.6
FOG SSRF via unauthenticated endpoint(s)
FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to version 1.5.10, a server-side-request-forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allowed an unauthenticated user to trigger a GET request as the server to an arbitrary endpoint and…
-
Medium 5.6
BigBlueButton Blind SSRF When Uploading Presentation (mitigation bypass)
BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom. BigBlueButton prior to versions 2.6.12 and 2.7.0-rc.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue is a bypass of CVE-2023-33176. A patch in versions 2.6.12 and 2.7.0-rc.1 disabled follow r…
-
Critical 9.8
OpenCRX allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request
An issue in openCRX v.5.2.2 allows a remote attacker to read internal files and execute server side request forgery attack via insecure DocumentBuilderFactory.
-
High 8.2
Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability in Custom Integration Upload
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform for managing the fulfillment of data privacy requests in runtime environments, and the enforcement of privacy regulations in code. The Fides web application allows a custom integration to be uploaded as a Z…
-
High 8.6
WPS Server Side Request Forgery in GeoServer
GeoServer is an open source software server written in Java that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. The OGC Web Processing Service (WPS) specification is designed to process information from any server using GET and POST requests. This presents t…
-
High 8.6
Unsecured WMS dynamic styling sld=<url> parameter affords blind unauthenticated SSRF in GeoServer
GeoServer is an open source software server written in Java that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. The WMS specification defines an ``sld=<url>`` parameter for GetMap, GetLegendGraphic and GetFeatureInfo operations for user supplied "dynamic sty…
-
High 7.5CVE-2023-45966 Public exploit
umputun remark42 version 1.12.1 and before has a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
-
High 7.5
Langchain Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability
In Langchain through 0.0.155, prompt injection allows an attacker to force the service to retrieve data from an arbitrary URL, essentially providing SSRF and potentially injecting content into downstream tasks.
-
Medium 6.6
Partial Server-Side Request Forgery in Home Assistant Core
Home assistant is an open source home automation. In affected versions the `hassio.addon_stdin` is vulnerable to a partial Server-Side Request Forgery where an attacker capable of calling this service (e.g.: through GHSA-h2jp-7grc-9xpp) may be able to invoke …
-
Low 3.7
Unsafe rego built-in allowed in Artifact Hub
Artifact Hub is a web-based application that enables finding, installing, and publishing packages and configurations for CNCF projects. During a security audit of Artifact Hub's code base a security researcher identified a bug in which a default unsafe rego b…
-
Medium 6.5
Server-Side Request Forgery in Apache ShenYu
There exists an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability located at the /sandbox/proxyGateway endpoint. This vulnerability allows us to manipulate arbitrary requests and retrieve corresponding responses by inputting any URL into the requestUrl paramet…
-
High 8.8
LangChain Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability
LangChain before 0.0.317 allows SSRF via document_loaders/recursive_url_loader.py because crawling can proceed from an external server to an internal server.
-
Low 2.0
Blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in remote schedule import feature in Engelsystem
Engelsystem is a shift planning system for chaos events. A Blind SSRF in the "Import schedule" functionality makes it possible to perform a port scan against the local environment. This vulnerability has been fixed in commit ee7d30b33. If a patch cannot be de…
-
Medium 4.3
Require strict cookies for image proxy requests in Nextcloud Mail
Nextcloud mail is an email app for the Nextcloud home server platform. In affected versions a missing check of origin, target and cookies allows for an attacker to abuse the proxy endpoint to denial of service a third server. It is recommended that the Nextcl…
-
Critical 10.0
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in vriteio/vrite
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository vriteio/vrite prior to 0.3.0.
-
Medium 6.8
Validate Your Inputs | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-beta1 (and earlier), 2.4.6-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p4 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p5 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privileged au…
-
Medium 5.3
Skype for Business Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Skype for Business Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
KEV Oct 10, 2023 -
Medium 6.5
Server-Side Request Forgery in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (GRMG Heartbeat application)
SAP NetWeaver AS Java (GRMG Heartbeat application) - version 7.50, allows an attacker to send a crafted request from a vulnerable web application, causing limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.
-
High 7.6
Presto JDBC Server-Side Request Forgery by nextUri
### Summary Presto JDBC is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when connecting a remote Presto server. An attacker can modify the nextUri parameter to internal server in response content that Presto JDBC client will request next and view sensitiv…
-
High 7.6
Presto JDBC Server-Side Request Forgery by redirect
### Summary Presto JDBC is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when connecting a remote Presto server. An attacker can construct a redirect response that Presto JDBC client will follow and view sensitive information from highly sensitive internal…
-
Critical 9.9
Server-Side Request Forgery in SLiMS
Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in SLims version 9.6.0. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to send requests to internal services or upload the contents of relevant files via the "scrape_image.php" file in the imageURL parameter.
-
Critical 10.0
TorchServe Server-Side Request Forgery
TorchServe is a tool for serving and scaling PyTorch models in production. TorchServe default configuration lacks proper input validation, enabling third parties to invoke remote HTTP download requests and write files to the disk. This issue could be taken ad…
-
Medium 6.3
Galaxy vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery during data imports
Galaxy is an open-source platform for FAIR data analysis. Prior to version 22.05, Galaxy is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, which allows a malicious to issue arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests from the application server to internal hosts and read their…