10 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
High 7.5
Limit handshake messages we are willing to accept post-handshake in crypto/tls
Handshake messages, such as KeyUpdate, are always considered as state-advancing, regardless of whether a handshake has been completed or not. As a result, a malicious client can keep sending KeyUpdate messages to force the server to keep performing key deriva…
-
High 7.5
Enforce maximum recursion depth in encoding/asn1
Enforce a recursion limit in Unmarshal to prevent stack exhaustion when parsing deeply-nested, recursive structures.
-
High 7.5
Malicious module proxy can bypass checksum database in cmd/go
A malicious module proxy can exploit a flaw in the go command's validation of module checksums to bypass checksum database validation. This vulnerability affects any user using an untrusted module proxy (GOMODPROXY) or checksum database (GOSUMDB). A malicious…
-
High 7.5
Panic in Dial and LookupPort when handling NUL byte on Windows in net
The Dial and LookupPort functions panic on Windows when provided with an input containing a NUL (0).
-
High 7.5
Inefficient policy validation in crypto/x509
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chain…
-
High 7.5
Unexpected work during chain building in crypto/x509
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 an…
-
High 7.5
Unauthenticated TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate record can cause persistent connection retention and DoS in crypto/tls
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
-
High 8.8
Code execution vulnerability in SWIG code generation in cmd/go
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
-
High 7.5
Incorrect parsing of IPv6 host literals in net/url
url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.
-
High 8.6
Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.