Vendor
charmbracelet
14 known vulnerabilities.
Products
5 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Medium 4.3
Soft Serve 0.7.1 through 0.11.6 Information Disclosure via LFS Locks
Soft Serve versions 0.7.1 through 0.11.6 fail to scope Git LFS lock queries by repository, allowing authenticated users to read lock metadata from repositories they cannot access. Attackers with write access to any repository can enumerate lock IDs globally t…
-
Medium 5.4
Soft Serve is missing an authorization check in LFS lock deletion
Soft Serve is a self-hostable Git server for the command line. Prior to version 0.11.2, an authorization bypass in the LFS lock deletion endpoint allows any authenticated user with repository write access to delete locks owned by other users by setting the fo…
-
Medium 4.6
Soft Serve does not sanitize ANSI escape sequences in user input
Soft Serve is a self-hostable Git server for the command line. In versions prior to 0.10.0, there are several places where the user can insert data (e.g. names) and ANSI escape sequences are not being removed, which can then be used, for example, to show fake…
-
Medium 5.3
Soft Serve allows path traversal attacks
Soft Serve is a self-hostable Git server for the command line. Prior to 0.8.2 , a path traversal attack allows existing non-admin users to access and take over other user's repositories. A malicious user then can modify, delete, and arbitrarily repositories a…
-
Medium 5.9
Charm vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF)
A vulnerability in which attackers could forge HTTP requests to manipulate the `charm` data directory to access or delete anything on the server. This has been patched and is available in release [v0.12.1](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/releases/tag/v…