arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock

Running a rt-kernel base on 6.2.0-rc3-rt1 on an Ampere Altra outputs
the following:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/u320:0
preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
3 locks held by kworker/u320:0/9:
#0: ffff3fff8c27d128 ((wq_completion)efi_rts_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#1: ffff80000861bdd0 ((work_completion)(&efi_rts_work.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#2: ffffdf7e1ed3e460 (efi_rt_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
Preemption disabled at:
efi_virtmap_load (./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:248)
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u320:0 Tainted: G W 6.2.0-rc3-rt1
Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System B81.03001.0005/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 1.08.20220218 (SCP: 1.08.20220218) 2022/02/18
Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
Call trace:
dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158)
show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165)
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 4))
dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114)
__might_resched (kernel/sched/core.c:10134)
rt_spin_lock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1769 (discriminator 4))
efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
[...]

This seems to come from commit ff7a167961d1 ("arm64: efi: Execute
runtime services from a dedicated stack") which adds a spinlock. This
spinlock is taken through:
efi_call_rts()
\-efi_call_virt()
\-efi_call_virt_pointer()
\-arch_efi_call_virt_setup()

Make 'efi_rt_lock' a raw_spinlock to avoid being preempted.

[ardb: The EFI runtime services are called with a different set of
translation tables, and are permitted to use the SIMD registers.
The context switch code preserves/restores neither, and so EFI
calls must be made with preemption disabled, rather than only
disabling migration.]