Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

Class Draft

The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.

More detail

Cryptographic algorithms are the methods by which data is scrambled to prevent observation or influence by unauthorized actors. Insecure cryptography can be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways, spoof identities of other users or devices, or other impacts.

It is very difficult to produce a secure algorithm, and even high-profile algorithms by accomplished cryptographic experts have been broken. Well-known techniques exist to break or weaken various kinds of cryptography. Accordingly, there are a small number of well-understood and heavily studied algorithms that should be used by most products. Using a non-standard or known-insecure algorithm is dangerous because a determined adversary may be able to break the algorithm and compromise whatever data has been protected.

Since the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common for an algorithm to be considered "unsafe" even if it was once thought to be strong. This can happen when new attacks are discovered, or if computing power increases so much that the cryptographic algorithm no longer provides the amount of protection that was originally thought.

For a number of reasons, this weakness is even more challenging to manage with hardware deployment of cryptographic algorithms as opposed to software implementation. First, if a flaw is discovered with hardware-implemented cryptography, the flaw cannot be fixed in most cases without a recall of the product, because hardware is not easily replaceable like software. Second, because the hardware product is expected to work for years, the adversary's computing power will only increase over time.

How to prevent it (5 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.

    For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192].

    Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.

    Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]

  2. Architecture and Design

    Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.

  3. Architecture and Design

    Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.

  4. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

    Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.

  5. Implementation, Architecture and Design

    When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.

Source: MITRE CWE-327

18 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • Critical 9.1
    CVE-2026-114820 Public exploit

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java S…

  • Critical 9.1
    CVE-2026-91403 Public exploit

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java S…

  • Medium 6.3
    CVE-2026-6330 Public exploit

    ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input

    The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encryp…

  • Critical 9.3
    CVE-2026-46395 Public exploit

    HAX CMS Vulnerable to Private Key Disclosure via Broken HMAC Implementation

    HAX CMS helps manage microsite universe with PHP or NodeJs backends. Prior to version 26.0.0, the `hmacBase64()` function in the HAXcms Node.js backend contains two critical cryptographic implementation errors that together allow any unauthenticated attacker …

  • Low 3.7
    CVE-2026-5682 Public exploit

    Meesho Online Shopping App com.meesho.supply endpoint risky encryption

    A vulnerability has been found in Meesho Online Shopping App up to 27.3 on Android. Affected is an unknown function of the file /api/endpoint of the component com.meesho.supply. Such manipulation leads to risky cryptographic algorithm. The attack may be perfo…

  • Medium 5.5
    CVE-2026-20833 Public exploit

    Windows Kerberos Information Disclosure Vulnerability

    Use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in Windows Kerberos allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  • Medium 6.0
    CVE-2025-14175 Public exploit

    Weak Algorithm Support in SSH Server on TL-WR820N

    A vulnerability in the SSH server of TP-Link TL-WR820N v2.80 allows the use of a weak cryptographic algorithm, enabling an adjacent attacker to intercept and decrypt SSH traffic. Exploitation may expose sensitive information and compromise confidentiality.

  • High 8.4
    CVE-2025-51726 Public exploit

    CyberGhostVPNSetup.exe (Windows installer) is signed using the weak cryptographic hash algorithm SHA-1, which is vulner…

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2025-2539 Public exploit

    File Away <= 3.9.9.0.1 - Missing Authorization to Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Read

    The File Away plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the ajax() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.9.0.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, leveraging the use …

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2022-3365 Public exploit

    Emote Interactive Remote Mouse Server command injection due to weak encoding

    Due to reliance on a trivial substitution cipher, sent in cleartext, and the reliance on a default password when the user does not set a password, the Remote Mouse Server by Emote Interactive can be abused by attackers to inject OS commands over theproduct's …

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2024-36823 Public exploit

    Weak encryption in Ninja Core

    The encrypt() function of Ninja Core v7.0.0 was discovered to use a weak cryptographic algorithm, leading to a possible leakage of sensitive information.

  • Critical 9.1
    CVE-2024-31989 Public exploit

    ArgoCD Vulnerable to Use of Risky or Missing Cryptographic Algorithms in Redis Cache

    Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. It has been discovered that an unprivileged pod in a different namespace on the same cluster could connect to the Redis server on port 6379. Despite having installed the latest version …

  • Medium 5.1
    CVE-2024-22318 Public exploit

    IBM i Access Client Solutions information disclosure

    IBM i Access Client Solutions (ACS) 1.1.2 through 1.1.4 and 1.1.4.3 through 1.1.9.4 is vulnerable to NT LAN Manager (NTLM) hash disclosure by an attacker modifying UNC capable paths within ACS configuration files to point to a hostile server. If NTLM is enabl…

  • High 8.2
    CVE-2023-3350 Public exploit

    Cryptographic Issues on IBERMATICA RPS

    A Cryptographic Issue vulnerability has been found on IBERMATICA RPS, affecting version 2019. By firstly downloading the log file, an attacker could retrieve the SQL query sent to the application in plaint text. This log file contains the password hashes code…

  • High 8.1
    CVE-2023-28244 Public exploit

    Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

  • High 7.5
    CVE-2022-2097 Public exploit

    AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes

    AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the…

  • Medium 5.4
    CVE-2021-41278 Public exploit

    Broken encryption in app-functions-sdk “AES” transform in EdgeX Foundry releases prior to Jakarta allows attackers to decrypt messages via unspecified vectors

    Functions SDK for EdgeX is meant to provide all the plumbing necessary for developers to get started in processing/transforming/exporting data out of the EdgeX IoT platform. In affected versions broken encryption in app-functions-sdk “AES” transform in EdgeX …

  • Medium 5.9
    CVE-2013-2566 Public exploit EPSS 84%

    The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for…