Weakness (CWE)
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
-
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
-
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
-
Architecture and Design
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
-
Architecture and Design
Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
-
Architecture and Design
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
-
Implementation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
Source: MITRE CWE-352
6,780 results · Feed
-
High 8.1
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.10 before 18.8.7, 18.9 before 18.9.3, and 18.10 before 18.10.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary GraphQL mutations on behalf of authenticated user…
-
Medium 4.6
CSRF vulnerability in UpdateAccessControlPolicyActiveStatus endpoint
Mattermost versions 11.2.x <= 11.2.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.10, 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1 fail to properly validate CSRF tokens in the /api/v4/access_control_policies/{policy_id}/activate endpoint, which allows an attacker to trick an admin into changing …
-
Medium 4.3
Theme Negotiation by Rules - Moderately critical - Cross-site request forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-012
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Theme Negotiation by Rules allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Theme Negotiation by Rules: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.
-
Medium 5.1
Ericsson Indoor Connect 8855 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
Ericsson Indoor Connect 8855 versions prior to 2025.Q3 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which, if exploited, can lead to unauthorized modification of certain information.
-
High 8.8
DedeCMS v5.7.118 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /sys_task_add.php.
-
High 7.1
MCP Go SDK Allows Cross-Site Tool Execution for HTTP Servers without Authorizatrion
The Go MCP SDK used Go's standard encoding/json. Prior to version 1.4.1, the Go SDK's Streamable HTTP transport accepted browser-generated cross-site `POST` requests without validating the `Origin` header and without requiring `Content-Type: application/json`…
-
High 8.1
AVideo's GET-Based CSRF in setPermission.json.php Enables Privilege Escalation via Arbitrary Permission Modification
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `plugin/Permissions/setPermission.json.php` endpoint accepts GET parameters for a state-changing operation that modifies user group permissions. The endpoint has no CSRF t…
-
High 8.8
AVideo Affected by CSRF on Plugin Import Endpoint Enables Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Malicious Plugin Upload
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `objects/pluginImport.json.php` endpoint allows admin users to upload and install plugin ZIP files containing executable PHP code, but lacks any CSRF protection. Combined …
-
Low 3.1
kalcaddle kodbox loginSubmit API index.class.php cross-site request forgery
A security flaw has been discovered in kalcaddle kodbox 1.64. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /workspace/source-code/plugins/oauth/controller/bind/index.class.php of the component loginSubmit API. Performing a manipulation of the argum…
-
High 7.2
Missing CSRF Protection on Administrative Endpoints in Nexxt Nebula 300+
Nexxt Solutions Nebula 300+ firmware through version 12.01.01.37 does not implement CSRF protections on state-changing endpoints such as /goform/setSysTools and other administrative interfaces. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious web requests that ar…
-
Medium 6.1
Post Snippits <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Update
The Post Snippits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page handlers for saving, adding, and deleting snippets. This makes it possib…
-
Medium 4.3
Neos Connector for Fakturama <= 0.0.14 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Neos Connector for Fakturama plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.0.14. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ncff_add_plugin_page() function which handles settings updates. This m…
-
High 8.1
Invelity Products Feeds <= 1.2.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Deletion
The Invelity Product Feeds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion via path traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing validation and sanitization in the 'createManageFeedPage' function. This makes it p…
-
Medium 4.3
login_register <= 1.2.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
The login_register plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page and insufficient input sanitization an…
-
Medium 4.3
Lobot Slider Administrator <= 0.6.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_page function. This makes it possible fo…
-
Medium 4.3
SR WP Minify HTML <= 2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attack…
-
Medium 4.3
Xhanch - My Advanced Settings <= 1.1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Xhanch - My Advanced Settings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `xms_setting()` function on the settings update handler. This makes …
-
Medium 4.3
Redirect countdown <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Redirect countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `countdown_settings_content()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticat…
-
Medium 4.3
Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possi…
-
Medium 4.3
WP Posts Re-order <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attack…
-
High 8.8
Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4: Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to arbitrary file upload
Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to induce authenticated users to submit crafted requests to a profile update endpoint handling file uploads. Attackers can exploit this to upload executable…
-
High 7.1
WordPress Flash Video Player plugin <= 5.0.4 - CSRF to XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4.
-
Medium 5.4
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability …
-
Medium 5.7
Admidio has Missing CSRF Validation on Role Delete, Activate, and Deactivate Actions
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, the delete, activate, and deactivate modes in modules/groups-roles/groups_roles.php perform destructive state changes on organizational roles but never validate an anti-CSRF …
-
Medium 5.7
Admidio is Missing CSRF Protection on Role Membership Date Changes
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.6 and below, the save_membership action in modules/profile/profile_function.php saves changes to a member's role membership start and end dates but does not validate the CSRF token. The handl…
-
Medium 4.3
Add Custom Fields to Media <= 2.0.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Deletion via 'delete' Parameter
The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin …
-
High 7.1
Cross‑Site Request Forgery in Link Aggregation Configuration
A CSRF vulnerability in the Link Aggregation configuration interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trick authenticated users into sending unauthorized POST requests to the device by luring them to a malicious webpage. This can silently alter th…
-
High 7.1
The update address CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to manipulate user address informatio…
-
High 8.1
MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to permanently destroy all deleted content …
-
High 8.0
MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability in the Add To Group functionality for user management (cUsers.cfc…
-
High 8.8
The import form CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to upload and install malicious form def…
-
Medium 6.5
MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability in the bundle creation functionality (csettings.cfc createBundle …
-
High 8.8
The Trash Restore CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to restore deleted content from the tr…
-
Medium 5.3CVE-2026-27978 Public exploit
Next.js: null origin can bypass Server Actions CSRF checks
Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 16.0.1 and prior to version 16.1.7, `origin: null` was treated as a "missing" origin during Server Action CSRF validation. As a result, requests from opaque contexts (s…
-
Medium 4.3
Edimax GS-5008PL <= 1.00.54 CSRF via Management CGI Endpoints
Edimax GS-5008PL firmware version 1.00.54 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by inducing logged-in administrators to visit malicious pages. Attackers can exp…
-
Medium 4.3
Hereta ETH-IMC408M CSRF via Configuration Setup
Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit fo…
-
Medium 6.9
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Raytha CMS
Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery across multiple endpoints. Attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the authenticated victim, will automatically send POST request to the endpoint (e. x. deletion of the data) without enf…
-
Medium 4.3
Telesquare SKT LTE Router SDT-CS3B1 CSRF System Command Execution
Telesquare SKT LTE Router SDT-CS3B1 version 1.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting missing request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages th…
-
High 8.8
Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 Privilege Escalation via user edit
Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated read-only users to elevate privileges to administrator by manipulating POST parameters. Attackers can send POST requests to the user edit endpoint with access…
-
Medium 5.3
Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 CSRF via user edit endpoint
Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions by crafting malicious web pages. Attackers can trick logged-in administrators into visiting a malicious site that submits …