15 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
High 8.8
Code execution vulnerability in SWIG code generation in cmd/go
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
-
High 8.6
Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
-
High 7.5CVE-2025-65637 Public exploit
Logrus is vulnerable to DoS when using Entry.Writer()
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in github.com/sirupsen/logrus when using Entry.Writer() to log a single-line payload larger than 64KB without newline characters. Due to limitations in the internal bufio.Scanner, the read fails with "token too long" a…
-
High 7.5
Excessive resource consumption when printing error string for host certificate validation in crypto/x509
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certi…
-
High 7.5
Panic when validating certificates with DSA public keys in crypto/x509
Validating certificate chains which contain DSA public keys can cause programs to panic, due to a interface cast that assumes they implement the Equal method. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
-
High 7.5
Quadratic complexity when parsing some invalid inputs in encoding/pem
The processing time for parsing some invalid inputs scales non-linearly with respect to the size of the input. This affects programs which parse untrusted PEM inputs.
-
High 7.5
Excessive CPU consumption in ParseAddress in net/mail
The ParseAddress function constructs domain-literal address components through repeated string concatenation. When parsing large domain-literal components, this can cause excessive CPU consumption.
-
High 7.5
Quadratic complexity when checking name constraints in crypto/x509
Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
-
High 7.0
Incorrect results returned from Rows.Scan in database/sql
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that…
-
High 7.5
Usage of ExtKeyUsageAny disables policy validation in crypto/x509
Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon.
-
High 7.5
Stack exhaustion in Parse in go/build/constraint
Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.
-
High 7.5
Stack exhaustion in Decoder.Decode in encoding/gob
Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.
-
High 7.5
Denial of service due to improper 100-continue handling in net/http
The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next r…
-
High 7.5
HTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in net/http
An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames. Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a reques…
-
High 7.5
Comments in display names are incorrectly handled in net/mail
The ParseAddressList function incorrectly handles comments (text within parentheses) within display names. Since this is a misalignment with conforming address parsers, it can result in different trust decisions being made by programs using different parsers.