net/mail at a glance
- Last 12 months
- 2
- Critical · all time
- 0
- Exploited · all time
- 0
- Public exploit · all time
- 0
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 2 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
Most common weaknesses
4 results · Feed
-
High 7.5
Quadratic string concatentation in consumeComment in net/mail
Well-crafted inputs reaching ParseAddress, ParseAddressList, and ParseDate were able to trigger excessive CPU exhaustion and memory allocations.
-
High 7.5
Quadratic string concatenation in consumePhrase in net/mail
Pathological inputs could cause DoS through consumePhrase when parsing an email address according to RFC 5322.
-
High 7.5
Excessive CPU consumption in ParseAddress in net/mail
The ParseAddress function constructs domain-literal address components through repeated string concatenation. When parsing large domain-literal components, this can cause excessive CPU consumption.
-
High 7.5
Comments in display names are incorrectly handled in net/mail
The ParseAddressList function incorrectly handles comments (text within parentheses) within display names. Since this is a misalignment with conforming address parsers, it can result in different trust decisions being made by programs using different parsers.