Apache Log4j 1.x at a glance
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
Most common weaknesses
4 results · Feed
-
High 8.8CVE-2022-23307 EPSS 54%
A deserialization flaw in the Chainsaw component of Log4j 1 can lead to malicious code execution.
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.
-
Critical 9.8
SQL injection in JDBC Appender in Apache Log4j V1
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate…
-
High 8.8CVE-2022-23302 EPSS 64%
Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSSink in Apache Log4j 1.x
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a Top…
-
High 7.5
Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSAppender in Apache Log4j 1.2
JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to pe…