Vendor
ETIC Telecom
9 known vulnerabilities.
ETIC Telecom at a glance
- Last 12 months
- 0
- Critical · all time
- 0
- Exploited · all time
- 0
- Public exploit · all time
- 0
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 5 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
Products
Latest advisories
-
High max 7.6
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) (Update B)
Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information and compromise the vulnerable device and other connected machines.
first Nov 3, 2022 -
High max 7.1ICSA-23-208-01 1 CVE
ETIC Telecom RAS Authentication
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to reconfigure the device or cause a denial-of-service condition.
9 results · Feed
-
High 7.4
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-Site Request Forgery
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.9.19 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). An external attacker with no access to the device can force the end user into submitting a "setconf" method request, not requiring any…
-
Medium 6.8
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 expose clear text credentials in the web portal. An attacker can access the ETIC RAS web portal and view the HTML code, which is configured to be hidden, thus allowing a connection to the …
-
Medium 4.8
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-site Scripting
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting in the appliance site name. The ETIC RAS web server saves the site name and then presents it to the administrators in a few different pages.
-
Medium 6.1
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-site Scripting
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in get view method under view parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that get their input from the client side…
-
Medium 4.8
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) Cross-site Scripting
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in the method parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that gets their input from the client side and reflects t…
-
High 7.1
ETIC Telecom Insecure Default Initialization of Resource
ETIC Telecom RAS versions 4.7.0 and prior the web management portal authentication disabled by default. This could allow an attacker with adjacent network access to alter the configuration of the device or cause a denial-of-service condition.
-
High 7.6
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) 4.5.0 and prior’s web portal is vulnerable to accepting malicious firmware packages that could provide a backdoor to an attacker and provide privilege escalation to the device.
-
Medium 5.9
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) 4.5.0 and prior is vulnerable to malicious file upload. An attacker could take advantage of this to store malicious files on the server, which could override sensitive and useful existing files on the fi…
-
Medium 6.2
ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server Path Traversal
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) 4.5.0 and prior’s application programmable interface (API) is vulnerable to directory traversal through several different methods. This could allow an attacker to read sensitive files from the server, in…