PowerSC at a glance
- Last 12 months
- 0
- Critical · all time
- 0
- Exploited · all time
- 0
- Public exploit · all time
- 0
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
13 results · Feed
-
Medium 5.9
IBM PowerSC information disclosure
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 MFA does not implement the "HTTP Strict Transport Security" (HSTS) web security policy mechanism. IBM X-Force ID: 276004.
-
Low 3.7
IBM PowerSC information disclosure
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 may allow a remote attacker to view session identifiers passed via URL query strings. IBM X-Force ID: 275110.
-
Medium 6.5
IBM PowerSC clickjacking
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly…
-
Medium 6.5
IBM PowerSC forced browsing
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 fails to properly restrict access to a URL or resource, which may allow a remote attacker to obtain unauthorized access to application functionality and/or resources. IBM X-Force ID: 275115.
-
Medium 6.3
IBM PowerSC session fixation
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 does not provide logout functionality, which could allow an authenticated user to gain access to an unauthorized user using session fixation. IBM X-Force ID: 275131.
-
Medium 5.3
IBM PowerSC improper authentication
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses single-factor authentication which can lead to unnecessary risk of compromise when compared with the benefits of a dual-factor authentication scheme. IBM X-Force ID: 275114.
-
Medium 5.3
IBM PowerSC cross-resource origin sharing
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) which could allow an attacker to carry out privileged actions and retrieve sensitive information as the domain name is not being limited to only trusted domains. IBM X-Force ID: 275130.
-
Medium 6.3
IBM PowerSC session fixation
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 275116.
-
Medium 5.3
IBM PowerSC weak security
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses insecure HTTP methods which could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized file request modification. IBM X-Force ID: 275109.
-
Medium 5.9
IBM PowerSC information disclosure
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 275117.
-
Medium 6.1
IBM PowerSC HTML injection
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 275113.
-
High 7.5
IBM PowerSC information Disclosure
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 275107.
-
Medium 5.9
IBM PowerSC information Disclosure
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 275129.