Kerberos 5 at a glance
- Last 12 months
- 3
- Critical · all time
- 0
- Exploited · all time
- 0
- Public exploit · all time
- 0
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 2 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
Most common weaknesses
3 results · Feed
-
Medium 5.9
In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.22.3, there is a NULL pointer dereference if an application calls gss_accept_sec_…
-
Medium 5.9
In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.22.3, there is an integer underflow and resultant out-of-bounds read if an applic…
-
High 7.1
In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.22 (with incremental propagation), there is an integer overflow for a large updat…