Vendor
puma
14 known vulnerabilities.
puma at a glance
Show as table
| Month | Vulnerabilities | Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 2 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 0 |
Products
14 results · Feed
-
High 7.5
Puma PROXY Protocol v1 Parser Allows Remote Memory Exhaustion
Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. From 5.5.0 until 7.2.1 and 8.0.2, when PROXY protocol v1 support is enabled, Puma reads incoming bytes into an internal buffer while waiting for CRLF to determine whether a PROXY v1 line is present, allowi…
-
High 7.5
Puma PROXY Protocol v1 Accepts Repeated Protocol Headers on Persistent Connections
Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. From 5.5.0 until 7.2.1 and 8.0.2, Puma is vulnerable to source IP spoofing when set_remote_address proxy_protocol: :v1 is enabled and persistent connections are used because Puma incorrectly re-parses PROX…
-
Medium 5.4CVE-2024-45614 Public exploit
Header normalization allows for client to clobber proxy set headers in Puma
Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. In affected versions clients could clobber values set by intermediate proxies (such as X-Forwarded-For) by providing a underscore version of the same header (X-Forwarded_For). Any users relying on proxy se…
-
Medium 5.9
HTTP Request/Response Smuggling in puma
Puma is a web server for Ruby/Rack applications built for parallelism. Prior to version 6.4.2, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling. Fixed versions limits the size of chun…
-
High 7.3
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests in puma
Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. Prior to versions 6.3.1 and 5.6.7, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling. Sever…
-
Critical 9.1
HTTP Request Smuggling in puma
Puma is a simple, fast, multi-threaded, parallel HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. When using Puma behind a proxy that does not properly validate that the incoming HTTP request matches the RFC7230 standard, Puma and the frontend proxy may disagree o…
-
High 8.0
Information Exposure when using Puma with Rails
Puma is a Ruby/Rack web server built for parallelism. Prior to `puma` version `5.6.2`, `puma` may not always call `close` on the response body. Rails, prior to version `7.0.2.2`, depended on the response body being closed in order for its `CurrentAttributes` …
-
Low 3.7
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') in puma
Puma is a HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Prior to versions 5.5.1 and 4.3.9, using `puma` with a proxy which forwards HTTP header values which contain the LF character could allow HTTP request smugggling. A client could smuggle a request through a…
-
High 7.5
Keepalive Connections Causing Denial Of Service in puma
Puma is a concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. The fix for CVE-2019-16770 was incomplete. The original fix only protected existing connections that had already been accepted from having their requests starved by greedy persistent-connections…
-
Medium 6.8
HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelini…
-
High 7.5CVE-2020-11076 Public exploit
HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4.
-
Medium 6.5
HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely …
-
Medium 6.5
HTTP Response Splitting in Puma
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and before 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. `CR`, `LF` or`/r`, `/n`) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additiona…
-
Medium 5.3
Potential DOS attack in Puma
In Puma before versions 3.12.2 and 4.3.1, a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack. If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional co…