Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Class Mapping discouraged

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary.

How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
  1. Requirements

    Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

    For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

    Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  2. Architecture and Design

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

    Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  3. Operation, Build and Compilation

    Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

    D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  4. Implementation

    Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:

    - Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.

    - When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.

    - Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.

    - If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.

  5. Operation, Build and Compilation

    Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

    Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

    For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  6. Operation

    Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

    For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

  7. Implementation

    Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.

Source: MITRE CWE-119

376 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • Critical 9.8

    ChakraCore vulnerable to privilege escalation

    ChakraCore allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability".

  • Critical 9.1

    An IMAP FETCH response line indicates the size of the returned data, in number of bytes. When that response says the da…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2017-8658 EPSS 20%

    ChakraCore RCE Vulnerability

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra JavaScript engine renders when handling objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability".

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2017-0252 EPSS 13%

    ChakraCore RCE Vulnerability

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Chakra Core in the way JavaScript engines render when handling objects in memory. aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This vulnerability is unique from CVE-2017-0223.

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2017-0223 EPSS 15%

    ChakraCore RCE Vulnerability

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Chakra Core in the way JavaScript engines render when handling objects in memory. aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This vulnerability is unique from CVE-2017-0252.

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2014-3931 Exploited EPSS 29%

    fastping.c in MRLG (aka Multi-Router Looking Glass) before 5.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause an arbitrary memory w…

    KEV Jul 7, 2025
  • Critical 9.8

    Buffer Overflow in pycrypto

    Heap-based buffer overflow in the ALGnew function in block_templace.c in Python Cryptography Toolkit (aka pycrypto) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as demonstrated by a crafted iv parameter to cryptmsg.py.

  • Critical 9.8

    tif_predict.h and tif_predict.c in libtiff 4.0.6 have assertions that can lead to assertion failures in debug mode, or …

  • Critical 9.8

    Nokogiri does not forbid namespace nodes in XPointer ranges

    xpointer.c in libxml2 before 2.9.5 (as used in Apple iOS before 10, OS X before 10.12, tvOS before 10, and watchOS before 3, and other products) does not forbid namespace nodes in XPointer ranges, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cau…

  • Critical 9.8

    Pillow Integer overflow in ImagingResampleHorizontal

    Integer overflow in the ImagingResampleHorizontal function in libImaging/Resample.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via negative values of the new size, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

  • Critical 9.8

    Dulwich Buffer Overflow when handling pack files

    Buffer overflow in the C implementation of the apply_delta function in _pack.c in Dulwich before 0.9.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted pack file.

  • Critical —

    Heap Based Buffer Overflow in libyaml

    The yaml_parser_scan_tag_uri function in scanner.c in LibYAML before 0.1.5 performs an incorrect cast, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted tags in a YAML document, whic…

  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2011-1889 Exploited EPSS 49%

    The NSPLookupServiceNext function in the client in Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway (TMG) 2010 allows remo…

    KEV Mar 3, 2022
  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2010-3765 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 83%

    Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x through 3.5.14 and 3.6.x through 3.6.11, Thunderbird 3.1.6 before 3.1.6 and 3.0.x before 3.0.10, …

    KEV Oct 6, 2025
  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-2008-4250 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 99%

    The Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, Server 2…

    KEV May 20, 2026
  • Critical 9.8
    CVE-1999-1588 Public exploit EPSS 10%

    Buffer overflow in nlps_server in Sun Solaris x86 2.4, 2.5, and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code…