Weakness (CWE)
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly.
How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
-
Architecture and Design
Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses. [REF-1109] [REF-1110] [REF-1111]
-
Architecture and Design
Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
-
Architecture and Design, Implementation
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
-
Implementation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
-
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.
-
Implementation
When your application combines data from multiple sources, perform the validation after the sources have been combined. The individual data elements may pass the validation step but violate the intended restrictions after they have been combined.
-
Implementation
Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow.
-
Implementation
Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.
Source: MITRE CWE-20
82 results · Clear filters · Feed
-
Critical 9.8
Cisco IP Phones Web Server Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web server for Cisco IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute code with root privileges or cause a reload of an affected IP phone, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 7.8
In binder_transaction of binder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 7.5
Improper Input Validation in Apache Solr
Apache Solr 5.0.0 to Apache Solr 8.3.1 are vulnerable to a Remote Code Execution through the VelocityResponseWriter. A Velocity template can be provided through Velocity templates in a configset `velocity/` directory or as a parameter. A user defined configse…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.8
This improper input validation vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary code to the system. To fix the…
KEV Jun 8, 2022 -
Critical 10.0
Insufficient vetting of parameters passed with the Prompt:Open IPC message between child and parent processes can resul…
KEV May 23, 2022 -
High 8.8
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server when it incorrectly handles processing of internal…
KEV Aug 26, 2026 -
Critical 9.8
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SharePoint when the software fails to check the source markup…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 7.2
Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Routers Command Injection Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges on an affected device to execute arbitrary commands. The vu…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 8.1
Apache Struts vulnerable to remote command execution (RCE) due to improper input validation
Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upp…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 8.8
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths, aka "Windows…
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
High 7.5
A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, rem…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.8
Spring Data Commons remote code injection vulnerability
Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can sup…
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
Drupal Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Drupal before 7.58, 8.x before 8.3.9, 8.4.x before 8.4.6, and 8.5.x before 8.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of an issue affecting multiple subsystems with default or common module configurations.
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 8.6CVE-2018-0158 Exploited
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software c…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 8.6CVE-2018-0172 Exploited
A vulnerability in the DHCP option 82 encapsulation functionality of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.5
A vulnerability in the Smart Install feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthentic…
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
High 8.6CVE-2018-0174 Exploited
A vulnerability in the DHCP option 82 encapsulation functionality of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.5CVE-2018-0159 Exploited
A vulnerability in the implementation of Internet Key Exchange Version 1 (IKEv1) functionality in Cisco IOS Software an…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 8.6CVE-2018-0173 Exploited
A vulnerability in the Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software function that restores encapsulated option 82 infor…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
Medium 5.9CVE-2017-12319 Exploited
A vulnerability in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) over an Ethernet Virtual Private Network (EVPN) for Cisco IOS XE S…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
A vulnerability in Java deserialization used by Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) prior to release 5.8 patch 9 c…
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco RV132W ADSL2+ Wireless-N VPN and RV134W VDSL2 Wireless-AC VPN Routers…
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS before 6.1.19, 7.0.x before 7.0.19, 7.1.x before 7.1.14, and 8.0.x before 8.0.6 allows remote…
KEV Aug 18, 2022 -
High 7.5CVE-2017-12234 Exploited
Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) feature in Cisco IOS 12.4 throug…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.5CVE-2017-12233 Exploited
Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) feature in Cisco IOS 12.4 throug…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
The DHCP relay subsystem of Cisco IOS 12.2 through 15.6 and Cisco IOS XE Software contains a vulnerability that could a…
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.5CVE-2017-12235 Exploited
A vulnerability in the implementation of the PROFINET Discovery and Configuration Protocol (PN-DCP) for Cisco IOS 12.2 …
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.8
(1) IQVW32.sys before 1.3.1.0 and (2) IQVW64.sys before 1.3.1.0 in the Intel Ethernet diagnostics driver for Windows al…
KEV Feb 10, 2023 -
High 8.8
DNN (aka DotNetNuke) has Remote Code Execution via a cookie
DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites."
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.8
Code execution in Apache Struts 1 plugin
The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage.
KEV Feb 10, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
A vulnerability in the Cisco Cluster Management Protocol (CMP) processing code in Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software c…
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
High 8.1
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Window…
KEV Apr 6, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
Apache Struts vulnerable to remote arbitrary command execution due to improper input validation
The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted …
KEV Nov 3, 2021 -
Critical 9.8
Improper Input Validation in Apache ActiveMQ
The Fileserver web application in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.14.0 allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via an HTTP PUT followed by an HTTP MOVE request.
KEV Feb 10, 2022 -
High 8.4
The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6…
KEV Sep 9, 2024 -
High 8.8
The (1) get_user and (2) put_user API functions in the Linux kernel before 3.5.5 on the v6k and v7 ARM platforms do not…
KEV Sep 15, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
Code injection in Apache Struts
Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL expressions via a parameter with a crafted (1) action:, (2) redirect:, or (3) redirectAction: prefix.
KEV Mar 25, 2022 -
High 7.8
Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 11.3.300.271 on Windows and Mac OS X and before 11.2.202.238 on …
KEV Mar 3, 2022 -
High 7.8
The Authenticode Signature Verification function in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows …
KEV Jun 8, 2022 -
Critical 9.8
Apache Struts Remote Java Code Execution
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during certain exception handling for mismatched data types of properties, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a craf…
KEV Jan 21, 2022