Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation

Class Mapping discouraged

The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly.

How to prevent it (8 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses. [REF-1109] [REF-1110] [REF-1111]

  2. Architecture and Design

    Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).

  3. Architecture and Design, Implementation

    Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.

  4. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

  5. Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

    Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.

  6. Implementation

    When your application combines data from multiple sources, perform the validation after the sources have been combined. The individual data elements may pass the validation step but violate the intended restrictions after they have been combined.

  7. Implementation

    Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow.

  8. Implementation

    Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.

Source: MITRE CWE-20

17 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2026-34197 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 98%

    Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authenticated users could perform RCE via Jolokia MBeans

    Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console. The default Jolokia…

    KEV Apr 16, 2026
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2025-6558 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 11%

    Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE and GPU in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.157 allowed a remote a…

    KEV Jul 22, 2025
  • High 7.5
    CVE-2020-3452 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 100%

    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software Web Services Read-Only Path Traversal Vulnerability

    A vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct directory traversal attacks and read sensitive files…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 7.8
    CVE-2020-0041 Exploited Public exploit

    In binder_transaction of binder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 7.5
    CVE-2019-17558 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 99%

    Improper Input Validation in Apache Solr

    Apache Solr 5.0.0 to Apache Solr 8.3.1 are vulnerable to a Remote Code Execution through the VelocityResponseWriter. A Velocity template can be provided through Velocity templates in a configset `velocity/` directory or as a parameter. A user defined configse…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2019-1068 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 57%

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server when it incorrectly handles processing of internal…

    KEV Aug 26, 2026
  • High 7.2
    CVE-2019-1652 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 96%

    Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Routers Command Injection Vulnerability

    A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges on an affected device to execute arbitrary commands. The vu…

    KEV Mar 3, 2022
  • High 8.1
    CVE-2018-11776 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 100%

    Apache Struts vulnerable to remote command execution (RCE) due to improper input validation

    Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upp…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2018-8414 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 73%

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths, aka "Windows…

    KEV Mar 25, 2022
  • High 7.5
    CVE-2018-0296 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 100%

    A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, rem…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 7.5
    CVE-2018-0171 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 99%

    A vulnerability in the Smart Install feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthentic…

    iOS
    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 7.8
    CVE-2015-2291 Exploited · Ransomware Public exploit EPSS 16%

    (1) IQVW32.sys before 1.3.1.0 and (2) IQVW64.sys before 1.3.1.0 in the Intel Ethernet diagnostics driver for Windows al…

    KEV Feb 10, 2023
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2017-9822 Exploited · Ransomware Public exploit EPSS 95%

    DNN (aka DotNetNuke) has Remote Code Execution via a cookie

    DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites."

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 8.1
    CVE-2017-0148 Exploited · Ransomware Public exploit EPSS 99%

    The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Window…

    KEV Apr 6, 2022
  • High 8.4
    CVE-2016-3714 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 97%

    The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6…

    KEV Sep 9, 2024
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2013-6282 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 40%

    The (1) get_user and (2) put_user API functions in the Linux kernel before 3.5.5 on the v6k and v7 ARM platforms do not…

    KEV Sep 15, 2022
  • High 7.8
    CVE-2012-1535 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 70%

    Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 11.3.300.271 on Windows and Mac OS X and before 11.2.202.238 on …

    KEV Mar 3, 2022