Weakness (CWE)
CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary.
How to prevent it (7 mitigations)
-
Requirements
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
-
Architecture and Design
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
-
Operation, Build and Compilation
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
-
Implementation
Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
-
Operation, Build and Compilation
Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
-
Operation
Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
-
Implementation
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
Source: MITRE CWE-119
3,733 results · Feed
-
High 7.1
The issue was addressed with improved bounds checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.3. An app may be able to c…
-
High 7.8
The issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13. An app may be able to e…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 VCDATA parsing functionality of G…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 VCDATA parsing functionality of G…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 VCDATA parsing functionality of G…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 VCDATA parsing functionality of G…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 chain_table parsing functionality…
-
High 7.8
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 chain_table parsing functionality…
-
High 7.0
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 fstWritex len functionality of GT…
-
High 7.0
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the fstReaderIterBlocks2 fstWritex len functionality of GT…
-
High 7.8
An improper array index validation vulnerability exists in the EVCD var len parsing functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities exist in the VCD var definition section functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A…
-
High 7.8
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the VZT LZMA_read_varint functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A specially c…
-
High 7.8
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the VZT LZMA_Read dmem extraction functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A sp…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities exist in the VZT vzt_rd_get_facname decompression functionality of GTKWave…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities exist in the VZT vzt_rd_get_facname decompression functionality of GTKWave…
-
High 7.8
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the LXT2 num_time_table_entries functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A spec…
-
High 7.8
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the LXT2 zlib block decompression functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A sp…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities exist in the LXT2 parsing functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A specially-cr…
-
High 7.8
Multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities exist in the LXT2 parsing functionality of GTKWave 3.3.115. A specially-cr…
-
Low 3.3
arm32: The cache may not be properly cleaned/invalidated (take two)
Arm provides multiple helpers to clean & invalidate the cache for a given region. This is, for instance, used when allocating guest memory to ensure any writes (such as the ones during scrubbing) have reached memory before handing over the page to a guest. Un…
-
Low 3.3
arm32: The cache may not be properly cleaned/invalidated
Arm provides multiple helpers to clean & invalidate the cache for a given region. This is, for instance, used when allocating guest memory to ensure any writes (such as the ones during scrubbing) have reached memory before handing over the page to a guest. Un…
-
Medium 4.4
Illegal Memory Access Vulnerability of ZTE's ZXCLOUD iRAI
There is an illegal memory access vulnerability of ZTE's ZXCLOUD iRAI product.When the vulnerability is exploited by an attacker with the common user permission, the physical machine will be crashed.
-
High 7.5
In Modem IMS Stack, there is a possible system crash due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of…
-
Medium 6.7
In display drm, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalatio…
-
Medium 6.7
In netdagent, there is a possible information disclosure due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local esc…
-
High 8.8
Multiple memory corruption issues were addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14…
-
High 7.8
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in BT Controller
Memory corruption in BT controller while parsing debug commands with specific sub-opcodes at HCI interface level.
-
Medium 6.0
Improper Restriction of Operation within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in TZ Secure OS
Information disclosure when the trusted application metadata symbol addresses are accessed while loading an ELF in TEE.
-
High 7.8
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in UTILS
Memory corruption in UTILS when modem processes memory specific Diag commands having arbitrary address values as input arguments.
-
High 7.8
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in MPP Performance
Memory corruption in MPP performance while accessing DSM watermark using external memory address.
-
Medium 6.7
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in Radio Interface Layer
Memory Corruption in Radio Interface Layer while sending an SMS or writing an SMS to SIM.
-
High 8.4
IBM AIX command execution
IBM AIX 7.2, 7.3, and VIOS 3.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the invscout command to execute arbitrary commands. IBM X-Force ID: 267966.
-
High 7.2
Out-of-bounds access a buffer in SIM management
Memory Corruption in SIM management while USIMPhase2init
-
Medium 6.7
Out-of-bounds access a buffer in IMS
Memory Corruption in IMS while calling VoLTE Streamingmedia Interface