Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-77: Command Injection

Class Draft Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command

The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.

More detail

Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.

How to prevent it (5 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.

  2. Implementation

    If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.

  3. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

  4. Operation

    Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.

  5. System Configuration

    Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.

Source: MITRE CWE-77

19 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • High 8.8
    CVE-2026-96951 Exploited

    Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

    KEV Oct 13, 2026
  • High 8.7
    CVE-2026-42271 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 91%

    LiteLLM: Authenticated command execution via MCP stdio test endpoints

    LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.74.2 to before version 1.83.7, two endpoints used to preview an MCP server before saving it — POST /mcp-rest/test/connection and POST /mcp-rest/test/tools/lis…

    KEV Jun 8, 2026
  • High 8.1
    CVE-2026-22719 Exploited EPSS 18%

    VMware Aria Operations command injection vulnerability

    VMware Aria Operations contains a command injection vulnerability. A malicious unauthenticated actor may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary commands which may lead to remote code execution in VMware Aria Operations while support-assisted product migratio…

    KEV Mar 3, 2026
  • High 8.7
    CVE-2025-4008 Exploited EPSS 93%

    Arbitrary Command Injection in Smartbedded MeteoBridge

    The Meteobridge web interface let meteobridge administrator manage their weather station data collection and administer their meteobridge system through a web application written in CGI shell scripts and C. This web interface exposes an endpoint that is vulne…

    KEV Oct 2, 2025
  • High 7.2
    CVE-2025-29635 Exploited EPSS 88%

    A command injection vulnerability in D-Link DIR-823X 240126 and 240802 allows an authorized attacker to execute arbitra…

    KEV Apr 24, 2026
  • High 7.3
    CVE-2024-12987 Exploited EPSS 98%

    DrayTek Vigor2960/Vigor300B Web Management Interface apmcfgupload os command injection

    A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in DrayTek Vigor2960 and Vigor300B 1.5.1.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi/apmcfgupload of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argu…

    KEV May 15, 2025
  • High 7.2
    CVE-2024-9380 Exploited EPSS 58%

    An OS command injection vulnerability in the admin web console of Ivanti CSA before version 5.0.2 allows a remote authe…

    KEV Oct 9, 2024
  • High 7.3
    CVE-2024-3273 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 100%

    D-Link DNS-320L/DNS-325/DNS-327L/DNS-340L HTTP GET Request nas_sharing.cgi command injection

    ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in D-Link DNS-320L, DNS-325, DNS-327L and DNS-340L up to 20240403. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/nas_sharing.cgi of the component HTTP GET Requ…

    KEV Apr 11, 2024
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-33538 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 42%

    TP-Link TL-WR940N V2/V4, TL-WR841N V8/V10, and TL-WR740N V1/V2 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerabil…

    KEV Jun 16, 2025
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2023-1389 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 100%

    TP-Link Archer AX21 (AX1800) firmware versions before 1.1.4 Build 20230219 contained a command injection vulnerability …

    KEV May 1, 2023
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2021-22899 Exploited EPSS 23%

    A command injection vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R11.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2020-25079 Exploited EPSS 54%

    An issue was discovered on D-Link DCS-2530L before 1.06.01 Hotfix and DCS-2670L through 2.02 devices. cgi-bin/ddns_enc.…

    KEV Aug 5, 2025
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2020-11978 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 99%

    Remote code execution (RCE) in Apache Airflow

    An issue was found in Apache Airflow versions 1.10.10 and below. A remote code/command injection vulnerability was discovered in one of the example DAGs shipped with Airflow which would allow any authenticated user to run arbitrary commands as the user runnin…

    KEV Jan 18, 2022
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2019-0541 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 53%

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the MSHTML engine inproperly validates input, aka "MSHTML …

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2017-6327 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 36%

    The Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.6.3-267 can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a sit…

    KEV Nov 3, 2021
  • High 7.8
    CVE-2016-6367 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 23%

    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software before 8.4(1) on ASA 5500, ASA 5500-X, PIX, and FWSM devices allows lo…

    KEV May 24, 2022
  • High 8.1
    CVE-2016-3081 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 97%

    Apache Struts RCE Vulnerability

    Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions.

    KEV Oct 8, 2026
  • High 8.8
    CVE-2015-2051 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 97%

    The D-Link DIR-645 Wired/Wireless Router Rev. Ax with firmware 1.04b12 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute a…

    KEV Feb 10, 2022
  • High 7.8
    CVE-2010-4345 Exploited Public exploit EPSS 18%

    Exim 4.72 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging the ability of the exim user account to speci…

    KEV Mar 25, 2022