Skip to content
OpenAdvisories

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-77: Command Injection

Class Draft Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command

The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.

More detail

Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.

How to prevent it (5 mitigations)
  1. Architecture and Design

    If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.

  2. Implementation

    If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.

  3. Implementation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

  4. Operation

    Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.

  5. System Configuration

    Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.

Source: MITRE CWE-77

3 results · Clear filters · Feed

  • Medium 6.1
    CVE-2025-59689 Exploited

    Libraesva ESG 4.5 through 5.5.x before 5.5.7 allows command injection via a compressed e-mail attachment. For ESG 5.0 a…

    KEV Sep 29, 2025
  • Medium 6.5
    CVE-2023-20118 Exploited EPSS 54%

    A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business Routers RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV32…

    KEV Mar 3, 2025
  • Medium 6.8
    CVE-2022-40765 Exploited · Ransomware EPSS 11%

    A vulnerability in the Edge Gateway component of Mitel MiVoice Connect through 19.3 (22.22.6100.0) could allow an authe…

    KEV Feb 21, 2023